The following layout test is failing on macOS imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/html/browsers/history/the-location-interface/location-protocol-setter-non-broken.html Probable cause: This test was marked as [ Failure Pass ] until https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/229191/webkit Flakiness Dashboard: https://webkit-test-results.webkit.org/dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html#showAllRuns=true&tests=imported%2Fw3c%2Fweb-platform-tests%2Fhtml%2Fbrowsers%2Fhistory%2Fthe-location-interface%2Flocation-protocol-setter-non-broken.html --- /Volumes/Data/slave/sierra-debug-tests-wk2/build/layout-test-results/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/html/browsers/history/the-location-interface/location-protocol-setter-non-broken-expected.txt +++ /Volumes/Data/slave/sierra-debug-tests-wk2/build/layout-test-results/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/html/browsers/history/the-location-interface/location-protocol-setter-non-broken-actual.txt @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ PASS Set HTTP URL frame location.protocol to x PASS Set data URL frame location.protocol to x PASS Set HTTP URL frame location.protocol to data -FAIL Set data URL frame location.protocol to data The object can not be cloned. +PASS Set data URL frame location.protocol to data PASS Set HTTP URL frame location.protocol to file PASS Set data URL frame location.protocol to file PASS Set HTTP URL frame location.protocol to ftp
Created attachment 342097 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 342097 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=342097&action=review > LayoutTests/ChangeLog:89 > +2018-06-06 David Fenton <david_fenton@apple.com> Probably need to remove this log entry. Bug title could also be renamed to [ Debug ] Layout Test http/tests/resourceLoadStatistics/prevalent-resource-with-user-interaction.html is flaky on macOS
Created attachment 342099 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 342099 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 342099 Committed r232566: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/232566>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
<rdar://problem/40875970>
Reopening since this only marked the test as flaky.