Bug 18159 - Acid3 test 65 takes more than 33ms (Windows)
Summary: Acid3 test 65 takes more than 33ms (Windows)
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 18208
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: WebCore Misc. (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Nobody
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-03-27 14:08 PDT by Franck
Modified: 2008-04-02 18:39 PDT (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Franck 2008-03-27 14:08:07 PDT
On my Sony laptop (XP SP2, Pentum M "Dothan" single core 1.7GHz), with build r31363, I CONSTANTLY - every single time - pass this test above 200ms !


avg outlet-time 210 ms
avg time when using battery power : 350ms

Screenshots:
http://img181.imageshack.us/my.php?image=timingoutletgz9.png
http://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=timingbatteryag6.png

I know my laptop is not top-of-the-line by any means but shouldn't this test be significantely faster ?

Comparatively, My old B&W G3 400MHz with Tiger / r31370 ran the test in 50ms.
proof :
http://img394.imageshack.us/my.php?image=r31370g3400mhzlt4.png
Comment 1 Maciej Stachowiak 2008-03-27 14:19:07 PDT
on my 2.4GHz MacBook Pro, I usually get around 75 milliseconds.
Comment 2 Maciej Stachowiak 2008-03-27 14:30:02 PDT
Oh, test 65, I was thinking of 26.

Is this a cached load or uncached?
Comment 3 Franck 2008-03-27 16:23:10 PDT
Using "Reload" does not improve the timing in any significant manner.
Loading more Acid3-pages after the first page is loaded in new Tabs/Windows doesn't help either. (excepting the loss of a few points on reload)
Comment 4 Peter Neumayr 2008-04-02 13:39:04 PDT
same here, never get below 160ms on a MacBook 2,2 GHz DualCore running Windows XP (Webkit r31446).
but he nice thing is, that test 26 passes without any runtime problems (= faster than 33 ms)
Comment 5 Adam Roben (:aroben) 2008-04-02 13:56:56 PDT
Please try again with r31466 or newer.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18208 ***
Comment 6 Franck 2008-04-02 18:39:10 PDT
As soon as a Win-build is available. I've seen your modification for 2 days, but I can't test a the moment.