It looks like it may have caused a regression, but I can't repro it. For now just don't checksum, and we can revisit later when I have time. Let's see what perf bots say.
Created attachment 328494 [details]
Attachment 328494 [details] did not pass style-queue:
Total errors found: 3 in 9 files
If any of these errors are false positives, please file a bug against check-webkit-style.
Comment on attachment 328494 [details]
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=328494&action=review
> + v(bool, eagerlyHashWebAssemblyModules, false, Normal, "Unnamed WebAssembly modules are identified in backtraces through their hash, if available.") \
nit: I'd name this starting with "use" to be consistent with many of our other options. Maybe:
Created attachment 328498 [details]
Comment on attachment 328498 [details]
Clearing flags on attachment: 328498
Committed r225550: <https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/225550>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.