WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
18041
DOMNodeRemoved events are sent twice
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18041
Summary
DOMNodeRemoved events are sent twice
Frank Illenberger
Reported
2008-03-24 00:51:05 PDT
When a node is removed from a DOMDocument, observers of the DOMNodeRemoved event are notified twice for each change when they should only be notified once. I could track down the reason for this behavior to ContainerNode.cpp where the same event is fired explicitly in line 390 and directly afterwards via willRemoveChild/dispatchChildRemovalEvents. Most probably, the explicit sending of the event in line 390 has to be removed.
Attachments
test case
(297 bytes, text/html)
2008-03-27 14:58 PDT
,
Alexey Proskuryakov
no flags
Details
Patch
(2.33 KB, patch)
2008-05-15 13:16 PDT
,
Vincent Ricard
darin
: review-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch + expected file
(3.71 KB, patch)
2008-05-25 13:49 PDT
,
Vincent Ricard
darin
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 1
2008-03-27 14:58:11 PDT
Created
attachment 20137
[details]
test case
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 2
2008-03-27 15:00:56 PDT
Confirmed with
r31309
.
Vincent Ricard
Comment 3
2008-05-15 13:16:00 PDT
Created
attachment 21174
[details]
Patch As mentioned in the report, remove the dispatchEvent line 390 fix the bug.
Darin Adler
Comment 4
2008-05-24 22:47:19 PDT
Comment on
attachment 21174
[details]
Patch Code change looks perfect. Oops! The patch needs to include the results of the regression test. That's the DOMNodeRemovedEvent -expected.txt file. The regression test should be turned into a text-only test so it doesn't dump the layout of the elements. That can be done by adding this code: if (window.layoutTestController) layoutTestController.dumpAsText(); to the test. By doing this, you'll make the test work as-is cross-platform and also eliminate the need to check in "pixel test results". Please resubmit the patch with a corrected regression test, and we'll get this checked in.
Vincent Ricard
Comment 5
2008-05-25 13:49:23 PDT
Created
attachment 21340
[details]
Patch + expected file I rewrote the test case to use the shouldBe methods (and added the expected file).
Darin Adler
Comment 6
2008-05-25 13:50:30 PDT
Comment on
attachment 21340
[details]
Patch + expected file Looks fine. r=me
Darin Adler
Comment 7
2008-06-08 12:42:31 PDT
Committed revision 34450.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug