WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
179366
REGRESSION(
r224179
): [GTK] Several WebViewEditor tests are failing since
r224179
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179366
Summary
REGRESSION(r224179): [GTK] Several WebViewEditor tests are failing since r224179
Carlos Garcia Campos
Reported
2017-11-07 00:35:59 PST
Unexpected failures (9) /WebKit2Gtk/TestWebsiteData /webkit2/WebKitWebsiteData/cache /webkit2/WebKitWebsiteData/databases /webkit2/WebKitWebsiteData/resource-load-statistics /webkit2/WebKitWebsiteData/configuration /WebKit2Gtk/TestInspector /webkit2/WebKitWebInspector/default /webkit2/WebKitWebInspector/manual-attach-detach /WebKit2Gtk/TestWebViewEditor /webkit2/WebKitWebView/cut-copy-paste/non-editable /webkit2/WebKitWebView/editable/editable /webkit2/WebKitWebView/cut-copy-paste/editable Unexpected timeouts (3) /WebCore/TestWebCore FileMonitorTest.DetectMultipleChanges FileMonitorTest.DetectChangeAndThenDelete /WebKit2Gtk/TestWebViewEditor /webkit2/WebKitWebView/editor-state/typing-attributes The TestWebViewEditor ones were introduced in
r224179
Attachments
Patch
(5.25 KB, patch)
2017-11-07 01:28 PST
,
Carlos Garcia Campos
mcatanzaro
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Carlos Garcia Campos
Comment 1
2017-11-07 01:28:18 PST
Created
attachment 326200
[details]
Patch
Build Bot
Comment 2
2017-11-07 01:29:30 PST
Thanks for the patch. If this patch contains new public API please make sure it follows the guidelines for new WebKit2 GTK+ API. See
http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKitGTK/AddingNewWebKit2API
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 3
2017-11-07 06:37:54 PST
Comment on
attachment 326200
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=326200&action=review
Hm. Problem #1 is I failed to run all the API tests. I only ran the TestWebViewEditor tests. But I knew this change would break other API tests unless I added calls to flush the editor state. I just forgot. Sorry. Problem #2 is I did not test under X11. It looks like the TestWebViewEditor tests are all currently passing on the Wayland bot. That's a bit surprising, but I guess the editor state flush works differently in Wayland as it is tightly coupled with the drawing code. My original flushEditorState() worked quite reliably for me, but I had tons of failures when I tried to use showInWindowAndWaitUntilMapped, so let's check the Wayland bot after this lands to make sure it's OK. Thanks for cleaning up after me.
> Source/WebKit/ChangeLog:11 > + In
r224179
, webkit_web_view_can_execute_editing_command() was optimized to use the sync path for commands > + supported by the WebViewEditorState, but the state requires a redraw to be up to date. We can't know if > + WebViewEditorState is in sync, when webkit_web_view_can_execute_editing_command() is called, so we always need > + to ask the web process.
It should work if we add more calls to flushEditorState() in all the API tests that require it. So it really should not be necessary to remove this. But I'm more comfortable with removing it, so OK. I only added it in the first place because you requested it.
> Tools/TestWebKitAPI/Tests/WebKitGtk/TestWebViewEditor.cpp:44 > - return G_SOURCE_REMOVE; > + return FALSE;
Oops.
> Tools/TestWebKitAPI/Tests/WebKitGtk/TestWebViewEditor.cpp:52 > + g_signal_handler_disconnect(m_webView, signalID);
Ooooooooops.
Carlos Garcia Campos
Comment 4
2017-11-07 08:19:22 PST
(In reply to Michael Catanzaro from
comment #3
)
> Comment on
attachment 326200
[details]
> Patch > > View in context: >
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=326200&action=review
> > Hm. Problem #1 is I failed to run all the API tests. I only ran the > TestWebViewEditor tests. But I knew this change would break other API tests > unless I added calls to flush the editor state. I just forgot. Sorry.
I pasted the current bot results, but this patch only fixes TestWebViewEditor, not the other ones, as I said in bug description.
> Problem #2 is I did not test under X11. It looks like the TestWebViewEditor > tests are all currently passing on the Wayland bot. That's a bit surprising, > but I guess the editor state flush works differently in Wayland as it is > tightly coupled with the drawing code. My original flushEditorState() worked > quite reliably for me, but I had tons of failures when I tried to use > showInWindowAndWaitUntilMapped, so let's check the Wayland bot after this > lands to make sure it's OK.
It worked with native xorg, wayland and weston, but always failed with xvfb, with this patch it passes in all the cases.
> Thanks for cleaning up after me. > > > Source/WebKit/ChangeLog:11 > > + In
r224179
, webkit_web_view_can_execute_editing_command() was optimized to use the sync path for commands > > + supported by the WebViewEditorState, but the state requires a redraw to be up to date. We can't know if > > + WebViewEditorState is in sync, when webkit_web_view_can_execute_editing_command() is called, so we always need > > + to ask the web process. > > It should work if we add more calls to flushEditorState() in all the API > tests that require it. So it really should not be necessary to remove this.
No, it's TestWebViewEditor what is failing under xvfb.
> But I'm more comfortable with removing it, so OK. I only added it in the > first place because you requested it. > > > Tools/TestWebKitAPI/Tests/WebKitGtk/TestWebViewEditor.cpp:44 > > - return G_SOURCE_REMOVE; > > + return FALSE; > > Oops. > > > Tools/TestWebKitAPI/Tests/WebKitGtk/TestWebViewEditor.cpp:52 > > + g_signal_handler_disconnect(m_webView, signalID); > > Ooooooooops.
Carlos Garcia Campos
Comment 5
2017-11-07 23:25:49 PST
Committed
r224567
: <
https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/224567
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug