RESOLVED FIXED 177714
XMLHttpRequest's responseXML should be annotated with [Exposed=Window]
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177714
Summary XMLHttpRequest's responseXML should be annotated with [Exposed=Window]
Sam Weinig
Reported 2017-09-30 20:56:14 PDT
XMLHttpRequest's responseXML should be annotated with [Exposed=Window]
Attachments
Patch (1.21 KB, patch)
2017-09-30 20:56 PDT, Sam Weinig
no flags
Patch (5.28 KB, patch)
2017-10-01 03:48 PDT, Sam Weinig
no flags
Patch (3.07 KB, patch)
2017-10-01 08:20 PDT, Sam Weinig
buildbot: commit-queue-
Archive of layout-test-results from ews102 for mac-elcapitan (1.03 MB, application/zip)
2017-10-01 09:25 PDT, Build Bot
no flags
Patch (9.96 KB, patch)
2017-10-01 09:42 PDT, Sam Weinig
no flags
Sam Weinig
Comment 1 2017-09-30 20:56:46 PDT
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 2 2017-09-30 22:01:59 PDT
Comment on attachment 322309 [details] Patch Is this not testable?
Sam Weinig
Comment 3 2017-10-01 02:45:53 PDT
(In reply to Alexey Proskuryakov from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 322309 [details] > Patch > > Is this not testable? Yes. I was hoping there was already a test and it would fail (hence the no r?) but it looks like I’ll have to write one.
Sam Weinig
Comment 4 2017-10-01 03:48:25 PDT
Sam Weinig
Comment 5 2017-10-01 07:32:03 PDT
(In reply to Sam Weinig from comment #3) > (In reply to Alexey Proskuryakov from comment #2) > > Comment on attachment 322309 [details] > > Patch > > > > Is this not testable? > > Yes. By which of course I mean, “yes, it is testable” (double negative caught me). Last WIP adds the test. I’m surprised that not having a result didn’t cause the EWS to fail.
Sam Weinig
Comment 6 2017-10-01 07:33:02 PDT
(In reply to Sam Weinig from comment #5) > (In reply to Sam Weinig from comment #3) > > (In reply to Alexey Proskuryakov from comment #2) > > > Comment on attachment 322309 [details] > > > Patch > > > > > > Is this not testable? > > > > Yes. > > By which of course I mean, “yes, it is testable” (double negative caught > me). Ahhhh. I meant negative not double negative!
Sam Weinig
Comment 7 2017-10-01 08:20:33 PDT
Sam Weinig
Comment 8 2017-10-01 08:51:01 PDT
Filed https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/7530 to add the new tests to WPT.
Build Bot
Comment 9 2017-10-01 09:25:11 PDT Comment hidden (obsolete)
Build Bot
Comment 10 2017-10-01 09:25:12 PDT Comment hidden (obsolete)
Sam Weinig
Comment 11 2017-10-01 09:42:44 PDT
Sam Weinig
Comment 12 2017-10-01 09:43:42 PDT
(In reply to Sam Weinig from comment #11) > Created attachment 322321 [details] > Patch New patch includes the now landed WPTs, imported back into WebKit.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 13 2017-10-01 12:42:02 PDT
> I’m surprised that not having a result didn’t cause the EWS to fail. Please feel encouraged to file a bug! I think that's a pretty bad issue.
Sam Weinig
Comment 14 2017-10-01 12:45:01 PDT
(In reply to Alexey Proskuryakov from comment #13) > > I’m surprised that not having a result didn’t cause the EWS to fail. > > Please feel encouraged to file a bug! I think that's a pretty bad issue. Ok. https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177723.
Darin Adler
Comment 15 2017-10-01 13:45:10 PDT
Comment on attachment 322321 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=322321&action=review > Source/WebCore/xml/XMLHttpRequest.cpp:175 > + ASSERT(scriptExecutionContext()->isDocument()); I would write: ASSERT(is<Document>(scriptExecutionContext())); But I see the file already has three places that do it the other way, calling isDocument(). > Source/WebCore/xml/XMLHttpRequest.cpp:257 > + if (!scriptExecutionContext()->isDocument() && type == ResponseType::Document) > + return { }; As I said above, I like the is<Document> style better. If you wrote it is<Document>(scriptExecutionContext() then you would include an unnecessary null check. But it’s annoying that the assumption that script execution context is non-null is implicit; when called from script I guess that is sort of obvious, but on the other hand it’s annoying that it’s called “script execution context” yet we stash it when created and don’t get a fresh one when being called from script again. I kind of wish there was a version that returned a reference and asserted.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 16 2017-10-01 14:12:52 PDT
Comment on attachment 322321 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 322321 Committed r222690: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/222690>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 17 2017-10-01 14:12:54 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 18 2017-10-01 14:13:47 PDT
Sam Weinig
Comment 19 2017-10-01 18:37:19 PDT
Add missing test results in r222693.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.