Update our port blocking blacklist to match Chrome's list. We should not see any compatibility impact here, since Chrome has been blocking this port for a long time.
<rdar://problem/34666525>
Created attachment 321962 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 321962 [details] Patch Attachment 321962 [details] did not pass mac-ews (mac): Output: http://webkit-queues.webkit.org/results/4676747 New failing tests: security/block-test.html
Created attachment 321968 [details] Archive of layout-test-results from ews102 for mac-elcapitan The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the mac-ews. Bot: ews102 Port: mac-elcapitan Platform: Mac OS X 10.11.6
Created attachment 321969 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 321969 [details] Patch Wikipedia says 6697 is the official number and 6679 the unofficial number. Do we want to block both?
(In reply to Alex Christensen from comment #6) > Comment on attachment 321969 [details] > Patch > > Wikipedia says 6697 is the official number and 6679 the unofficial number. > Do we want to block both? Yes. :-)
Please file a bug to update the port blocking part of the fetch spec, https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#port-blocking.
(In reply to Brent Fulgham from comment #7) > (In reply to Alex Christensen from comment #6) > > Comment on attachment 321969 [details] > > Patch > > > > Wikipedia says 6697 is the official number and 6679 the unofficial number. > > Do we want to block both? > > Yes. :-) Oh, wait =- I'm not sure. I don't think Chrome does, so we might create some compatibility issues if we did.
Comment on attachment 321969 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=321969&action=review > Source/WebCore/platform/URL.cpp:1281 > + 6679, // Alternate IRC SSL [Apple addition] Why [Apple addition] if this came from Chrome?
(In reply to Sam Weinig from comment #10) > Comment on attachment 321969 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=321969&action=review > > > Source/WebCore/platform/URL.cpp:1281 > > + 6679, // Alternate IRC SSL [Apple addition] > > Why [Apple addition] if this came from Chrome? It's an Apple addition (in our sources) to a list provided by Mozilla. I could mark it as Chrome, but I don't think we've done that with other similar changes.
(In reply to Alex Christensen from comment #6) > Comment on attachment 321969 [details] > Patch > > Wikipedia says 6697 is the official number and 6679 the unofficial number. > Do we want to block both? I checked with some people, and we decided that yes, we should block both. I've updated the bug to reflect this.
Created attachment 322095 [details] Patch
Committed r222623: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/222623>