WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
NEW
177226
wrapKey_unwrapKey.worker.html is flaky
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177226
Summary
wrapKey_unwrapKey.worker.html is flaky
Ms2ger (he/him; ⌚ UTC+1/+2)
Reported
2017-09-20 05:54:51 PDT
With a diff like +PASS Can wrap and unwrap RSA-OAEP private key keys using pkcs8 and AES-KW +PASS Can wrap and unwrap RSA-OAEP private key keys as non-extractable using pkcs8 and AES-KW where I've also seen RSA-PSS instead of RSA-OAEP. That is, these tests sometimes run, and sometimes don't. The tests will run if the following function returns true: function wrappingIsPossible(exportedKey, algorithmName) { if ("byteLength" in exportedKey && algorithmName === "AES-KW") { return exportedKey.byteLength % 8 === 0; } ... I suspect that we don't guarantee that the length is correct (but it might also be something else entirely).
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Jiewen Tan
Comment 1
2017-09-20 11:16:44 PDT
(In reply to Ms2ger from
comment #0
)
> With a diff like > > +PASS Can wrap and unwrap RSA-OAEP private key keys using pkcs8 and AES-KW > +PASS Can wrap and unwrap RSA-OAEP private key keys as non-extractable using > pkcs8 and AES-KW > > where I've also seen RSA-PSS instead of RSA-OAEP. That is, these tests > sometimes run, and sometimes don't. > > The tests will run if the following function returns true: > > function wrappingIsPossible(exportedKey, algorithmName) { > if ("byteLength" in exportedKey && algorithmName === "AES-KW") { > return exportedKey.byteLength % 8 === 0; > } > ... > > I suspect that we don't guarantee that the length is correct (but it might > also be something else entirely).
That seems tree. Does this sound the same?
https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/6102
I have filed a PR long time ago but no reviewers wish to take any actions or maybe I am missing something to motivate them.
Ms2ger (he/him; ⌚ UTC+1/+2)
Comment 2
2017-09-21 00:30:19 PDT
(In reply to Jiewen Tan from
comment #1
)
> (In reply to Ms2ger from
comment #0
) > > With a diff like > > > > +PASS Can wrap and unwrap RSA-OAEP private key keys using pkcs8 and AES-KW > > +PASS Can wrap and unwrap RSA-OAEP private key keys as non-extractable using > > pkcs8 and AES-KW > > > > where I've also seen RSA-PSS instead of RSA-OAEP. That is, these tests > > sometimes run, and sometimes don't. > > > > The tests will run if the following function returns true: > > > > function wrappingIsPossible(exportedKey, algorithmName) { > > if ("byteLength" in exportedKey && algorithmName === "AES-KW") { > > return exportedKey.byteLength % 8 === 0; > > } > > ... > > > > I suspect that we don't guarantee that the length is correct (but it might > > also be something else entirely). > > That seems tree. > > Does this sound the same?
https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/6102
> > I have filed a PR long time ago but no reviewers wish to take any actions or > maybe I am missing something to motivate them.
I don't think it's the same, but it seems similar. (If you rebase the PR and ping me there, I can probably merge it.)
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug