Add modern decoders for POD types

[Alex Christensen]

Add modern decoders for POD types

[Alex Christensen]

Created attachment 320019 [details]
Patch

[Geoffrey Garen]

Comment on attachment 320019 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=320019&action=review

r=me

> Source/WebKit/Platform/IPC/Decoder.cpp:241
> +Decoder& Decoder::operator>>(std::optional<bool>& optional)
> +{
> +    return getOptional(optional);
> +}
> +
> +Decoder& Decoder::operator>>(std::optional<uint8_t>& optional)
> +{
> +    return getOptional(optional);
> +}
> +
> +Decoder& Decoder::operator>>(std::optional<uint16_t>& optional)
> +{
> +    return getOptional(optional);
> +}
> +
> +Decoder& Decoder::operator>>(std::optional<uint32_t>& optional)
> +{
> +    return getOptional(optional);
> +}
> +
> +Decoder& Decoder::operator>>(std::optional<uint64_t>& optional)
> +{
> +    return getOptional(optional);
> +}
> +
> +Decoder& Decoder::operator>>(std::optional<int32_t>& optional)
> +{
> +    return getOptional(optional);
> +}
> +
> +Decoder& Decoder::operator>>(std::optional<int64_t>& optional)
> +{
> +    return getOptional(optional);
> +}
> +
> +Decoder& Decoder::operator>>(std::optional<float>& optional)
> +{
> +    return getOptional(optional);
> +}

Kind of weird that our idiom is to use overloading instead of a template parameter for these >> functions and for our decode functions.

If we're just trying to verify that our type is a POD type, we can use std::is_pod.

[Alex Christensen]

With enums (which are also POD types) we also check to see if they are valid enums.  I think the intent was once to only have certain types serializable, but since that list has grown so much maybe we should clean this up a bit.

[Alex Christensen]

http://trac.webkit.org/r221698

[Darin Adler]

Seems like we should find a way to allow any type to be optional and not write out each function like this.

[Radar WebKit Bug Importer]

<rdar://problem/34693681>