<https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2017-August/029471.html>
Created attachment 319261 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 319261 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=319261&action=review > Websites/webkit.org/code-style.md:-763 > - : MySuperClass() We also prefer to omit calling the default base class constructor (as the compiler will emit code to do this for us). I did not change the example to reflect this. Let me know if I should.
Comment on attachment 319261 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=319261&action=review >> Websites/webkit.org/code-style.md:-763 >> - : MySuperClass() > > We also prefer to omit calling the default base class constructor (as the compiler will emit code to do this for us). I did not change the example to reflect this. Let me know if I should. It may make sense to add arguments to base class ctor to avoid cofusion
Comment on attachment 319261 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=319261&action=review >>> Websites/webkit.org/code-style.md:-763 >>> - : MySuperClass() >> >> We also prefer to omit calling the default base class constructor (as the compiler will emit code to do this for us). I did not change the example to reflect this. Let me know if I should. > > It may make sense to add arguments to base class ctor to avoid cofusion I think we should.
There appears to be no ❤️ to solidify this in the style guide. Makes me 😢. Maybe one day. Let's just move on.