Bug 17292 - REGRESSION: Apple discussions search box render issue
Summary: REGRESSION: Apple discussions search box render issue
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Evangelism (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: All All
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Nobody
URL: http://discussions.apple.com/index.jspa
Keywords: InRadar, Regression
: 17361 17764 18015 18320 19857 20418 21561 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-02-10 12:57 PST by Steven Kim
Modified: 2008-10-12 13:18 PDT (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
reduction (1.03 KB, text/html)
2008-02-10 13:53 PST, Robert Blaut
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Steven Kim 2008-02-10 12:57:50 PST
Search box renders funny.  Looks to render twice.  This doesn't happen on the public release of Safari.  Screenshot at http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg165/skim1420/junkyard/webkit_bug_search.png
Comment 1 Robert Blaut 2008-02-10 13:53:21 PST
Created attachment 19049 [details]
reduction

Apple website developers uses a sort of 'hack' to target Safari 3.

/* target safari 3 \*/
html>body*#search input {font-size: 12px}
html>body*#search .srchimgs {display: none;}
html>body*#search input.sbox {width: 162px;}
/**/

 The hack no longer works due to fixed a bug 16751. The bug should be treated as Evangelism bug.
Comment 2 Robert Blaut 2008-02-10 14:03:14 PST
More info about this 'hack' -> http://dithered.chadlindstrom.ca/css_filters/nonvalidating/star7_hack.html
Comment 3 Mark Rowe (bdash) 2008-02-10 19:34:23 PST
<rdar://problem/5734517>
Comment 4 Robert Blaut 2008-02-11 04:04:05 PST
Evangelism bug shouldn't have P1 priority.
Comment 5 Robert Blaut 2008-02-14 06:33:29 PST
*** Bug 17361 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Robert Blaut 2008-03-11 04:18:32 PDT
*** Bug 17764 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Matt Lilek 2008-03-22 10:45:37 PDT
*** Bug 18015 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 mitz 2008-04-05 01:27:51 PDT
*** Bug 18320 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Link Dupont 2008-07-02 12:55:41 PDT
*** Bug 19857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Matt Lilek 2008-08-17 09:04:41 PDT
*** Bug 20418 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Matt Lilek 2008-10-12 13:18:47 PDT
*** Bug 21561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***