Maintain interaction information imageURL as a URL, not a string
Created attachment 308993 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 308993 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=308993&action=review > Source/WebKit2/ChangeLog:4 > + Maintain interaction information imageURL as a URL, not a string > + https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171639 Ok. But why? Just because it is better?
(In reply to Sam Weinig from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 308993 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=308993&action=review > > > Source/WebKit2/ChangeLog:4 > > + Maintain interaction information imageURL as a URL, not a string > > + https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171639 > > Ok. But why? Just because it is better? Is that so bad? :) But no, there is a good reason (for url, not for imageURL, but no point changing one and not the other).
Comment on attachment 308993 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 308993 Committed r216168: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/216168>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
(In reply to Tim Horton from comment #3) > (In reply to Sam Weinig from comment #2) > > Comment on attachment 308993 [details] > > Patch > > > > View in context: > > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=308993&action=review > > > > > Source/WebKit2/ChangeLog:4 > > > + Maintain interaction information imageURL as a URL, not a string > > > + https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171639 > > > > Ok. But why? Just because it is better? > > Is that so bad? :) Nope. Consistency is a fine reason. > But no, there is a good reason (for url, not for > imageURL, but no point changing one and not the other). What was the reason?