WebGPU remote layer hosting
<rdar://problem/31005380>
<rdar://problem/31005384>
Created attachment 304235 [details] Patch
Created attachment 304236 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 304236 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=304236&action=review > Source/WebKit2/Shared/mac/RemoteLayerTreeTransaction.mm:897 > + case PlatformCALayer::LayerTypeWebGLLayer: WebGPULayer
Comment on attachment 304236 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=304236&action=review r+ with WebGL -> WebGPU fix in RemoteLayerTreeTransaction.mm. > Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/ca/cocoa/PlatformCALayerCocoa.mm:302 > +#endif ick.
Committed r213786.
Committed r213786: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/213786>
Comment on attachment 304236 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=304236&action=review > Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/ca/PlatformCALayer.h:77 > + LayerTypeWebGPULayer, Does it actually need to be its own layer type, or can we just rename LayerTypeWebGLLayer to be a bit more generic?
(In reply to comment #9) > Comment on attachment 304236 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=304236&action=review > > > Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/ca/PlatformCALayer.h:77 > > + LayerTypeWebGPULayer, > > Does it actually need to be its own layer type, or can we just rename > LayerTypeWebGLLayer to be a bit more generic? Done in 169628