NEW 164531
Spread(ArrayUse:@child) should participate in CSE
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164531
Summary Spread(ArrayUse:@child) should participate in CSE
Saam Barati
Reported 2016-11-08 15:48:08 PST
After I land https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164258, we will emit Spread(ArrayUse:@child) only when we know that the iterator protocol is proven to be non-observable. This means we can CSE two Spread(ArrayUse:@child) together when we've proven that nobody changes @child in between the two Spreads.
Attachments
Saam Barati
Comment 1 2016-11-08 15:48:53 PST
It's important to also note that Spread will allocate a JSFixedArray, but JSFixedArray is a VM internal cell, it's not observable to user code. Therefore, it's ok to simply drop the second allocation and use the first one.
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 2 2018-01-19 13:37:35 PST
Since the comment mentioning this bug was removed in r227229, can this be changed to RESOLVED/WONTFIX?
Saam Barati
Comment 3 2018-01-19 13:41:35 PST
(In reply to David Kilzer (:ddkilzer) from comment #2) > Since the comment mentioning this bug was removed in r227229, can this be > changed to RESOLVED/WONTFIX? I think it's worth keeping this. We could theoretically do this if we speculated in some particular way. Or if we proved the input to Spread doesn't have a symbol iterator.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.