RESOLVED FIXED Bug 163270
[Win][Direct2D] Add initial Pattern handling implementation
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163270
Summary [Win][Direct2D] Add initial Pattern handling implementation
Brent Fulgham
Reported 2016-10-10 22:57:14 PDT
Provide an implementation of the WebKit Pattern concept so that tiled images and border images can be drawn properly. This get tests in fast/borders/border-image-01.html (and other) to work properly.
Attachments
Patch (13.70 KB, patch)
2016-10-10 23:02 PDT, Brent Fulgham
simon.fraser: review+
Brent Fulgham
Comment 1 2016-10-10 23:02:33 PDT
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 2 2016-10-10 23:10:56 PDT
Comment on attachment 291233 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=291233&action=review > Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/GraphicsContext.h:561 > + ID2D1Brush* solidStrokeBrush(); > + ID2D1Brush* solidFillBrush(); > + ID2D1Brush* patternStrokeBrush(); > + ID2D1Brush* patternFillBrush(); Can these be const?
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 3 2016-10-10 23:12:01 PDT
Comment on attachment 291233 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=291233&action=review > Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/win/PatternDirect2D.cpp:58 > + HRESULT hr = renderTarget->CreateBitmapBrush(tileImage()->nativeImage().get(), &bitmapBrushProperties, &brushProperties, &patternBrush); > + ASSERT(hr); > + return patternBrush; What's the ownership model here? Does the caller need to release or destroy the brush? Can we use smart pointers to make this easier?
Brent Fulgham
Comment 4 2016-10-11 08:59:10 PDT
Comment on attachment 291233 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=291233&action=review >> Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/GraphicsContext.h:561 >> + ID2D1Brush* patternFillBrush(); > > Can these be const? Yes. I'll fix them. >> Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/win/PatternDirect2D.cpp:58 >> + return patternBrush; > > What's the ownership model here? Does the caller need to release or destroy the brush? Can we use smart pointers to make this easier? You are right -- I should be using the adoptCOM utility function.
Brent Fulgham
Comment 5 2016-10-11 09:00:14 PDT
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.