RESOLVED FIXED 163188
Update generated bindings code so that dictionary structures no longer need explicit constructors
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163188
Summary Update generated bindings code so that dictionary structures no longer need e...
Chris Dumez
Reported 2016-10-09 16:53:32 PDT
Update generated bindings code so that dictionary structures no longer need constructors.
Attachments
Patch (45.24 KB, patch)
2016-10-09 17:15 PDT, Chris Dumez
no flags
Patch (45.62 KB, patch)
2016-10-09 17:46 PDT, Chris Dumez
no flags
Chris Dumez
Comment 1 2016-10-09 17:15:09 PDT
Darin Adler
Comment 2 2016-10-09 17:39:24 PDT
Comment on attachment 291054 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=291054&action=review Now that I see your change written out, I don’t see any downside to this. > Source/WebCore/bindings/scripts/CodeGeneratorJS.pm:1144 > + $result .= " return result;\n"; We want WTFMove(result) here, otherwise we end up copying the result to make the Optional<> version. Saves work and reference count churn when there are data members that have non-trivial constructors. > Source/WebCore/dom/ClipboardEvent.h:37 > struct Init : public EventInit { No need for the "public" here. > Source/WebCore/dom/CustomEvent.h:44 > struct Init : public EventInit { No need for the "public" here. > Source/WebCore/dom/EventModifierInit.h:32 > struct EventModifierInit : public UIEventInit { No need for the "public" here. > Source/WebCore/editing/Editor.cpp:884 > RefPtr<DataTransfer> dataTransfer = DataTransfer::createForCopyAndPaste(policy); This should be auto. > Source/WebCore/editing/Editor.cpp:889 > + init.clipboardData = dataTransfer.get(); This should just be standard assignment. I don’t think a call to .get() would be needed here; RefPtr = RefPtr should compile and RefPtr = Ref should also compile with no get call.
Chris Dumez
Comment 3 2016-10-09 17:44:10 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > Comment on attachment 291054 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=291054&action=review > > Now that I see your change written out, I don’t see any downside to this. Well, the downside is that we'll have to pass non-nullable wrapper type as raw pointers for now. Thankfully, this is not common in dictionaries (only 1 instance in WebKit).
Chris Dumez
Comment 4 2016-10-09 17:46:52 PDT
Chris Dumez
Comment 5 2016-10-09 18:18:40 PDT
Comment on attachment 291055 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 291055 Committed r206974: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/206974>
Chris Dumez
Comment 6 2016-10-09 18:18:45 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.