If it does not pose any perf regression!
Quick note: is-array-xxx microbenchmarks does not pose any perf regression.
Kraken 10x does not pose any perf regression. baseline patched ai-astar 104.779+-5.396 104.388+-7.231 audio-beat-detection 43.249+-0.479 ? 45.301+-3.136 ? might be 1.0475x slower audio-dft 122.091+-0.207 121.975+-0.120 audio-fft 36.526+-2.884 35.894+-0.336 might be 1.0176x faster audio-oscillator 50.530+-0.125 ? 50.622+-0.245 ? imaging-darkroom 87.718+-0.181 87.644+-0.127 imaging-desaturate 55.689+-0.057 ? 55.714+-0.089 ? imaging-gaussian-blur 79.802+-5.441 76.817+-13.184 might be 1.0389x faster json-parse-financial 45.172+-1.699 44.412+-0.483 might be 1.0171x faster json-stringify-tinderbox 27.742+-2.602 26.060+-0.269 might be 1.0645x faster stanford-crypto-aes 41.248+-0.297 ? 41.319+-0.517 ? stanford-crypto-ccm 40.269+-3.120 40.129+-0.829 stanford-crypto-pbkdf2 99.160+-2.688 ? 99.512+-2.383 ? stanford-crypto-sha256-iterative 33.518+-0.055 ^ 33.391+-0.071 ^ definitely 1.0038x faster <arithmetic> 61.964+-0.517 61.656+-1.027 might be 1.0050x faster
OK! Octane also does not pose perf regressions! baseline patched encrypt 0.18176+-0.00113 0.18137+-0.00095 decrypt 2.94496+-0.02083 2.94092+-0.01175 deltablue x2 0.14056+-0.00248 ? 0.14811+-0.01230 ? might be 1.0537x slower earley 0.27780+-0.00071 ? 0.27826+-0.00056 ? boyer 4.72845+-0.01276 4.72487+-0.00844 navier-stokes x2 4.78319+-0.01079 ? 4.79980+-0.03981 ? raytrace x2 0.82850+-0.01110 ? 0.83306+-0.00671 ? richards x2 0.08974+-0.00250 ? 0.09145+-0.00223 ? might be 1.0190x slower splay x2 0.36832+-0.00193 ? 0.37042+-0.00178 ? regexp x2 19.45685+-0.13716 ? 19.61233+-0.12050 ? pdfjs x2 42.33251+-0.49102 ? 43.09881+-0.87100 ? might be 1.0181x slower mandreel x2 50.41776+-1.02654 49.49966+-0.36287 might be 1.0185x faster gbemu x2 35.68241+-0.56086 ? 36.03761+-0.88023 ? closure 0.62445+-0.01067 0.61458+-0.00300 might be 1.0161x faster jquery 8.15364+-0.19368 8.05949+-0.04403 might be 1.0117x faster box2d x2 14.47267+-0.16801 ? 14.60825+-0.14110 ? zlib x2 365.77266+-5.31775 357.42082+-5.87320 might be 1.0234x faster typescript x2 837.10984+-11.77692 835.97700+-13.96924 <geometric> 5.71762+-0.01958 ? 5.74389+-0.03770 ? might be 1.0046x slower
Created attachment 289217 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 289217 [details] Patch I'll perform rebaseline.
Created attachment 289218 [details] Patch
OK, ready for review!
Created attachment 289219 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 289219 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=289219&action=review > Source/JavaScriptCore/ChangeLog:11 > + This automatically offers optimization to previous IsSring node: dropping cell check by using CellUse edge filter. Typo, IsSring -> IsString
Comment on attachment 289219 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=289219&action=review Thanks! >> Source/JavaScriptCore/ChangeLog:11 >> + This automatically offers optimization to previous IsSring node: dropping cell check by using CellUse edge filter. > > Typo, IsSring -> IsString Oops! Fixed.
Committed r206098: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/206098>
Committed r206128: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/206128>