RESOLVED FIXED Bug 161076
DOMTokenList’s value and stringifier should not return parsed tokens
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161076
Summary DOMTokenList’s value and stringifier should not return parsed tokens
Ryosuke Niwa
Reported 2016-08-23 00:32:09 PDT
The latest DOM spec requires that we forward call getAttribute/setAttribute to get and set value and stringify DOMTokenList.
Attachments
Patch (16.40 KB, patch)
2016-08-23 00:44 PDT, Ryosuke Niwa
cdumez: review+
commit-queue: commit-queue-
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 1 2016-08-23 00:44:06 PDT
Chris Dumez
Comment 2 2016-08-23 07:02:03 PDT
Comment on attachment 286688 [details] Patch The spec has changed recently after we implemented it. I am working on getting the spec back the way it was. Our current behavior is nicer, this patch makes it worse.
Chris Dumez
Comment 4 2016-08-23 07:36:25 PDT
Let's discuss today in person.
Chris Dumez
Comment 5 2016-08-24 15:15:38 PDT
Comment on attachment 286688 [details] Patch r=me. Looks like getting the spec changed back is going to be difficult.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 6 2016-08-27 17:27:09 PDT
Comment on attachment 286688 [details] Patch Rejecting attachment 286688 [details] from commit-queue. Failed to run "['/Volumes/Data/EWS/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkit-patch', '--status-host=webkit-queues.webkit.org', '--bot-id=webkit-cq-02', 'apply-attachment', '--no-update', '--non-interactive', 286688, '--port=mac']" exit_code: 2 cwd: /Volumes/Data/EWS/WebKit Last 500 characters of output: Log Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 3. patching file LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/dom/lists/DOMTokenList-stringifier-expected.txt patching file LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/dom/lists/DOMTokenList-value-expected.txt patching file LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/dom/nodes/Element-classlist-expected.txt Failed to run "[u'/Volumes/Data/EWS/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/svn-apply', '--force', '--reviewer', u'Chris Dumez']" exit_code: 1 cwd: /Volumes/Data/EWS/WebKit Full output: http://webkit-queues.webkit.org/results/1956506
Chris Dumez
Comment 7 2016-09-27 21:12:00 PDT
Ryosuke, I think we can land this, no?
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 8 2016-09-27 21:21:17 PDT
(In reply to comment #7) > Ryosuke, I think we can land this, no? Oh, I didn't realize that this patch hadn't been landed. I guess CQ failed?
Chris Dumez
Comment 9 2016-09-27 21:22:05 PDT
(In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Ryosuke, I think we can land this, no? > > Oh, I didn't realize that this patch hadn't been landed. I guess CQ failed? Looks like the CQ failed because the patch needs rebasing, yes.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 10 2016-09-27 21:25:37 PDT
(In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > (In reply to comment #7) > > > Ryosuke, I think we can land this, no? > > > > Oh, I didn't realize that this patch hadn't been landed. I guess CQ failed? > > Looks like the CQ failed because the patch needs rebasing, yes. Okay, let me rebase & land it tomorrow morning. Or feel free to land it if you'd like.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 11 2016-09-28 16:37:15 PDT
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.