RESOLVED FIXED 160530
Drop DocumentType.internalSubset attribute
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160530
Summary Drop DocumentType.internalSubset attribute
Chris Dumez
Reported 2016-08-03 15:52:27 PDT
Drop DocumentType.internalSubset attribute. It is no longer in the DOM specification, and other browsers have already dropped it. In WebKit, it is always null anyway.
Attachments
Patch (12.77 KB, patch)
2016-08-03 16:11 PDT, Chris Dumez
no flags
Chris Dumez
Comment 1 2016-08-03 16:11:35 PDT
Alex Christensen
Comment 2 2016-08-03 21:51:49 PDT
Comment on attachment 285288 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=285288&action=review > Source/WebCore/bindings/objc/DOMDocumentType.mm:77 > - return IMPL->internalSubset(); > + return IMPL->internalSubsetForBindings(); What are the implications of keeping the objc bindings when the javascript bindings are gone? Before we started freezing the objc bindings, wouldn't we have removed the whole method?
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 3 2016-08-03 22:12:46 PDT
Comment on attachment 285288 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 285288 Committed r204114: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/204114>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 4 2016-08-03 22:12:51 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Chris Dumez
Comment 5 2016-08-04 09:03:12 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > Comment on attachment 285288 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=285288&action=review > > > Source/WebCore/bindings/objc/DOMDocumentType.mm:77 > > - return IMPL->internalSubset(); > > + return IMPL->internalSubsetForBindings(); > > What are the implications of keeping the objc bindings when the javascript > bindings are gone? Before we started freezing the objc bindings, wouldn't > we have removed the whole method? No, before the freeze, we wouldn't have been able to remove the whole method. After the freeze though we would in theory be able to remove the internalSubsetForBindings() method and hack the ObjC bindings to stop calling it. However, this is usually not possible because of GObject bindings.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.