WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
Bug 158245
Bopomofo ruby in Dictionary.app is written horizontally (when it should be written vertically)
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158245
Summary
Bopomofo ruby in Dictionary.app is written horizontally (when it should be wr...
Myles C. Maxfield
Reported
2016-05-31 17:47:42 PDT
Bopomofo ruby in Dictionary.app is written horizontally (when it should be written vertically)
Attachments
WIP
(3.38 KB, patch)
2016-05-31 17:48 PDT
,
Myles C. Maxfield
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(7.32 KB, patch)
2016-06-01 18:38 PDT
,
Myles C. Maxfield
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(344.93 KB, patch)
2016-06-01 19:02 PDT
,
Myles C. Maxfield
darin
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(2)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Myles C. Maxfield
Comment 1
2016-05-31 17:48:32 PDT
Created
attachment 280201
[details]
WIP
Myles C. Maxfield
Comment 2
2016-05-31 17:49:34 PDT
<
rdar://problem/25675318
>
Myles C. Maxfield
Comment 3
2016-06-01 18:38:54 PDT
Created
attachment 280291
[details]
Patch
Myles C. Maxfield
Comment 4
2016-06-01 19:02:21 PDT
Created
attachment 280293
[details]
Patch
Darin Adler
Comment 5
2016-06-02 11:23:01 PDT
Comment on
attachment 280293
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=280293&action=review
> LayoutTests/ChangeLog:10 > + Rebaselined fast/table/border-collapsing/004-vertical.html. These results are pixel-identical in > + MiniBrowser and Safari, which means the old render tree dump was wrong.
I really don’t understand the logic here. How does the fact that nothing changed visually mean that the old render tree dump was wrong? Are you saying we had a wrong render tree but somehow accidentally got exactly the right results displayed? Can we do something else for the future health of this test? Maybe turn it into a reference test? I guess not because it doesn’t fit into the viewport.
Myles C. Maxfield
Comment 6
2016-06-03 19:00:44 PDT
Comment on
attachment 280293
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=280293&action=review
>> LayoutTests/ChangeLog:10 >> + MiniBrowser and Safari, which means the old render tree dump was wrong. > > I really don’t understand the logic here. How does the fact that nothing changed visually mean that the old render tree dump was wrong? Are you saying we had a wrong render tree but somehow accidentally got exactly the right results displayed? Can we do something else for the future health of this test? Maybe turn it into a reference test? I guess not because it doesn’t fit into the viewport.
It turns out that this comment is wrong - when I was comparing MiniBrowser and Safari, I resized the windows to get them to line up, which caused full relayouts, which papered over the problem. It turns out that the -expected.txt change is actually due to the creation of the horizontal scrollbar triggering a second layout. Before this patch, this second layout didn't descend deeply into the render tree, however, with this patch, it correctly does. It is a progression. I'll change the comment.
Myles C. Maxfield
Comment 7
2016-06-03 19:03:37 PDT
Committed
r201677
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/201677
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug