ASSIGNED156350
stress/computed-function-names.js.dfg-maximal-flush-validate-no-cjit is failing
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156350
Summary stress/computed-function-names.js.dfg-maximal-flush-validate-no-cjit is failing
Jiewen Tan
Reported 2016-04-07 11:09:00 PDT
JSC test: stress/computed-function-names.js.dfg-maximal-flush-validate-no-cjit is failing on this build: https://build.webkit.org/builders/Apple%20El%20Capitan%2032-bit%20JSC%20%28BuildAndTest%29/builds/2020 These are the JSC changes included in this build, I am not sure which one is directly related the failing. https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/199140 https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/199144 Error log: stress/computed-function-names.js.dfg-maximal-flush-validate-no-cjit: test_script_9910: line 2: 7270 Segmentation fault: 11 ( "$@" ../../.vm/JavaScriptCore.framework/Resources/jsc --useFTLJIT\=false --useFunctionDotArguments\=true --validateGraph\=true --useMaximalFlushInsertionPhase\=true --useConcurrentJIT\=false --thresholdForJITAfterWarmUp\=100 computed-function-names.js ) stress/computed-function-names.js.dfg-maximal-flush-validate-no-cjit: ERROR: Unexpected exit code: 139 FAIL: stress/computed-function-names.js.dfg-maximal-flush-validate-no-cjit
Attachments
Mark Lam
Comment 1 2016-04-07 11:18:05 PDT
I'll take a first stab at this.
Mark Lam
Comment 2 2016-04-07 12:36:37 PDT
I've tried running the test manually on a local debug build of ToT (r199166), but have absolutely no luck in reproducing this.
Ryan Haddad
Comment 3 2016-04-07 13:18:19 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > I've tried running the test manually on a local debug build of ToT > (r199166), but have absolutely no luck in reproducing this. If relevant, it only appears to be failing on 32-bit testers,
Mark Lam
Comment 4 2016-04-07 13:20:47 PDT
(In reply to comment #3) > If relevant, it only appears to be failing on 32-bit testers, I am testing on a 32-bit build. No repro. I'm currently hijacking the bot to see if it's introducing any special sauce into the mix that makes this happen.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.