RESOLVED FIXED 154852
NetworkCache: Web process leaks resource buffer when using shareable reasources
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154852
Summary NetworkCache: Web process leaks resource buffer when using shareable reasources
Carlos Garcia Campos
Reported 2016-03-01 04:05:20 PST
This is causing us running out of fds when using a web process limit of one after long time running, since we never release the shareable resources.
Attachments
Patch (1.70 KB, patch)
2016-03-01 04:10 PST, Carlos Garcia Campos
darin: review+
Carlos Garcia Campos
Comment 1 2016-03-01 04:10:56 PST
Darin Adler
Comment 2 2016-03-01 08:33:56 PST
Comment on attachment 272558 [details] Patch Better still to replace PassRefPtr with RefPtr&& or Ref&&, but I’m sure someone will come along to do that later.
Carlos Garcia Campos
Comment 3 2016-03-01 08:58:09 PST
(In reply to comment #2) > Comment on attachment 272558 [details] > Patch > > Better still to replace PassRefPtr with RefPtr&& or Ref&&, but I’m sure > someone will come along to do that later. I thought about that, there's tricky part in SubresourceLoader::didReceiveDataOrBuffer that calls ResourceLoader::didReceiveDataOrBuffer, but yes, it can be done. I decided to leave that for a follow up patch, to ensure the leak is fixed first.
Carlos Garcia Campos
Comment 4 2016-03-01 09:42:35 PST
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 5 2016-03-01 22:39:59 PST
I can see how this avoids refcount churn, however I don't see how this can fix a leak. What am I missing? + ResourceLoader::didReceiveBuffer() expects a PassRefPtr, but we + are passing a raw pointer making PassRefPtr to take another + reference instead of transfering the ownership as expected. This was compensated by the original RefPtr still having a pointer to the object, so there was also one more deref().
Carlos Garcia Campos
Comment 6 2016-03-01 23:11:11 PST
(In reply to comment #5) > I can see how this avoids refcount churn, however I don't see how this can > fix a leak. What am I missing? > > + ResourceLoader::didReceiveBuffer() expects a PassRefPtr, but we > + are passing a raw pointer making PassRefPtr to take another > + reference instead of transfering the ownership as expected. > > This was compensated by the original RefPtr still having a pointer to the > object, so there was also one more deref(). hmm, you are indeed right. When passing the raw pointer, the PassRefPtr takes another ref but the original RefPtr releases its own when didReceiveResource() finishes. I was doing a lot of tests and didn't see any ShareableResource freed before applying this patch, but I guess I didn't disable the memory cache either. So, maybe there's no leak but when using a single web process we end up with a lot of resources cached in memory keeping their fds alive. We might consider copying the data in the web process and releasing the mmap.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.