Created attachment 271468 [details]
Comment on attachment 271468 [details]
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=271468&action=review
r=me with improved comment.
> + The DFG was doing a good job at optimizing the function
> + at the leaf of the recursion. Because of that, we often
> + wouldn't sample it. I fixed this by making the leaf
> + function do more work.
It's not clear from this comment that this test failure does not reflect a bug in the VM. Instead, it is the test that is not set up to meet its own expectations. Hence, the fix requires that the test be modified. Can you update the comment to say something to that effect?
landed fix in: