WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED WONTFIX
153207
Use PLATFORM(WIN) instead of OS(WINDOWS)
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153207
Summary
Use PLATFORM(WIN) instead of OS(WINDOWS)
Vitaliy Slobodin
Reported
2016-01-18 08:48:43 PST
Use PLATFORM(WIN) to fix building ports on Windows which require their own implementation of WorkQueue.
Attachments
Patch
(1.78 KB, patch)
2016-01-18 08:58 PST
,
Vitaliy Slobodin
achristensen
: review-
achristensen
: commit-queue-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Vitaliy Slobodin
Comment 1
2016-01-18 08:58:35 PST
Created
attachment 269225
[details]
Patch
Alex Christensen
Comment 2
2016-01-18 22:22:48 PST
What building does this fix?
Vitaliy Slobodin
Comment 3
2016-01-18 23:06:55 PST
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> What building does this fix?
Officially unsupported Qt (QtWebkit) port. We're reviving QtWebkit port. And we would like to have the upstream version of Webkit. Unfortunately, the upstream version has places (preprocessor macros) like this one which blocks the porting process. This change doesn't break anything but allows us to use the upstream version. As a side note: we have no plans to upstream QtWebkit in foreseeable future. Thanks.
Alex Christensen
Comment 4
2016-01-19 12:53:16 PST
Is this the only such change needed? If you're not upstreaming it, then you will probably have to manage a lot of such changes. Why will putting this change in the WebKit repository help anything?
Vitaliy Slobodin
Comment 5
2016-01-19 13:41:44 PST
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> Is this the only such change needed? If you're not upstreaming it, then you > will probably have to manage a lot of such changes. Why will putting this > change in the WebKit repository help anything?
I was going to type my points of view. But I realized that you are absolutely right. It will be best and correct to keep Qt-specific things in our source tree only. We will handle it on our end. Should I mark it as resolved? And sorry for the inconvenience! Thanks!
Alex Christensen
Comment 6
2016-01-19 18:25:22 PST
No problem.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug