RESOLVED FIXED 152038
Web Inspector: console.count() shouldn't show a colon in front of a number
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152038
Summary Web Inspector: console.count() shouldn't show a colon in front of a number
Nikita Vasilyev
Reported 2015-12-08 22:18:51 PST
Created attachment 266968 [details] [Image] Bug Steps: 1. Run console.count() in the console Expected: "1" Actual: ": 1"
Attachments
[Image] Bug (2.46 KB, image/png)
2015-12-08 22:18 PST, Nikita Vasilyev
no flags
Not quite sure if the empty string (`console.count("")`) should show `: 1` or if it should be equivalent to `console.count()`. (1.66 KB, patch)
2016-01-10 08:41 PST, Johan K. Jensen
no flags
Archive of layout-test-results from ews101 for mac-yosemite (950.71 KB, application/zip)
2016-01-10 09:29 PST, Build Bot
no flags
Archive of layout-test-results from ews104 for mac-yosemite-wk2 (822.90 KB, application/zip)
2016-01-10 09:32 PST, Build Bot
no flags
Archive of layout-test-results from ews115 for mac-yosemite (866.88 KB, application/zip)
2016-01-10 09:35 PST, Build Bot
no flags
Patch (7.39 KB, patch)
2016-01-11 10:51 PST, Johan K. Jensen
no flags
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 1 2015-12-08 22:19:02 PST
Johan K. Jensen
Comment 2 2016-01-10 08:41:06 PST
Created attachment 268646 [details] Not quite sure if the empty string (`console.count("")`) should show `: 1` or if it should be equivalent to `console.count()`.
Build Bot
Comment 3 2016-01-10 09:29:16 PST
Comment on attachment 268646 [details] Not quite sure if the empty string (`console.count("")`) should show `: 1` or if it should be equivalent to `console.count()`. Attachment 268646 [details] did not pass mac-ews (mac): Output: http://webkit-queues.webkit.org/results/675349 New failing tests: inspector/console/console-api.html
Build Bot
Comment 4 2016-01-10 09:29:19 PST
Created attachment 268648 [details] Archive of layout-test-results from ews101 for mac-yosemite The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the mac-ews. Bot: ews101 Port: mac-yosemite Platform: Mac OS X 10.10.5
Build Bot
Comment 5 2016-01-10 09:32:20 PST
Comment on attachment 268646 [details] Not quite sure if the empty string (`console.count("")`) should show `: 1` or if it should be equivalent to `console.count()`. Attachment 268646 [details] did not pass mac-wk2-ews (mac-wk2): Output: http://webkit-queues.webkit.org/results/675350 New failing tests: inspector/console/console-api.html
Build Bot
Comment 6 2016-01-10 09:32:23 PST
Created attachment 268649 [details] Archive of layout-test-results from ews104 for mac-yosemite-wk2 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the mac-wk2-ews. Bot: ews104 Port: mac-yosemite-wk2 Platform: Mac OS X 10.10.5
Build Bot
Comment 7 2016-01-10 09:35:47 PST
Comment on attachment 268646 [details] Not quite sure if the empty string (`console.count("")`) should show `: 1` or if it should be equivalent to `console.count()`. Attachment 268646 [details] did not pass mac-debug-ews (mac): Output: http://webkit-queues.webkit.org/results/675346 New failing tests: inspector/console/console-api.html
Build Bot
Comment 8 2016-01-10 09:35:50 PST
Created attachment 268650 [details] Archive of layout-test-results from ews115 for mac-yosemite The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the mac-debug-ews. Bot: ews115 Port: mac-yosemite Platform: Mac OS X 10.10.5
Blaze Burg
Comment 9 2016-01-10 11:27:21 PST
Comment on attachment 268646 [details] Not quite sure if the empty string (`console.count("")`) should show `: 1` or if it should be equivalent to `console.count()`. View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=268646&action=review > Source/JavaScriptCore/inspector/agents/InspectorConsoleAgent.cpp:178 > + if (title.isEmpty()) What if the argument is all whitespace?
Blaze Burg
Comment 10 2016-01-10 11:31:18 PST
Comment on attachment 268646 [details] Not quite sure if the empty string (`console.count("")`) should show `: 1` or if it should be equivalent to `console.count()`. Looks like a good change, but the corresponding test needs to be rebaselined and edited to cover this change. The test is LayoutTests/inspector/console/console-api.html. Please add the following cases (at least) to the test, to cover the counting functionality and the handling of whitespace/empty arguments. console.count() // second time console.count("") console.count(" ") console.count("") // second time console.count(" ") // second time console.count("counter title") console.count("counter title") // second time
Blaze Burg
Comment 11 2016-01-10 11:32:17 PST
(In reply to comment #10) > Comment on attachment 268646 [details] > Not quite sure if the empty string (`console.count("")`) should show `: 1` > or if it should be equivalent to `console.count()`. > > Looks like a good change, but the corresponding test needs to be rebaselined > and edited to cover this change. The test is > LayoutTests/inspector/console/console-api.html. > > Please add the following cases (at least) to the test, to cover the counting > functionality and the handling of whitespace/empty arguments. > > console.count() // second time > console.count("") > console.count(" ") > console.count("") // second time > console.count(" ") // second time > console.count("counter title") > console.count("counter title") // second time We should probably also add test cases for passing null, undefined, object, number to console.count() to document what it does.
Blaze Burg
Comment 12 2016-01-10 11:33:02 PST
(In reply to comment #2) > Created attachment 268646 [details] > Not quite sure if the empty string (`console.count("")`) should show `: 1` > or if it should be equivalent to `console.count()`. I think we should match what Chrome / Firefox does. This is mainly implemented in Web Inspector for compatibility with other devtools.
Johan K. Jensen
Comment 13 2016-01-10 13:19:01 PST
Both Firefox and Chrome has `console.count()` and `console.count('')` be equivalent (i.e. the count would be 2 after running those commands), while any additional whitespace to the title-parameter would create new counters. Firefox also writes "<no label>: x" for counters without a title or with the empty title (but not for whitespace). Should WebKit also show "<no label>: x" for those two cases? (And if so, should it be localized? And how would I do that?) Or should it just show "x"?
Blaze Burg
Comment 14 2016-01-11 10:28:06 PST
(In reply to comment #13) > Both Firefox and Chrome has `console.count()` and `console.count('')` be > equivalent (i.e. the count would be 2 after running those commands), while > any additional whitespace to the title-parameter would create new counters. > Firefox also writes "<no label>: x" for counters without a title or with the > empty title (but not for whitespace). > Should WebKit also show "<no label>: x" for those two cases? (And if so, > should it be localized? And how would I do that?) Or should it just show "x"? Yes, let's match what they do. I think it looks kind of dumb (do you have a better idea?) but showing nothing is even worse. Don't worry about localizing this; none of the console messages are currently localized. They should be localized, but that should be addressed in a separate bug.
Johan K. Jensen
Comment 15 2016-01-11 10:51:32 PST
Joseph Pecoraro
Comment 16 2016-01-11 14:38:20 PST
I've been wondering for a while now if we should just drop console.count. Last I checked, no browser implements a sufficiently useful version of it. They all track just line number, so in minified sources it is completely useless as all counts() are considered the same line. Has this grown in popularity somewhere? Is there a good use case for it?
Blaze Burg
Comment 17 2016-01-11 22:53:10 PST
Comment on attachment 268697 [details] Patch r=me, This is looking great. Thanks for updating the test!
Nikita Vasilyev
Comment 18 2016-01-11 23:16:12 PST
(In reply to comment #16) > I've been wondering for a while now if we should just drop console.count. > Last I checked, no browser implements a sufficiently useful version of it. > They all track just line number, so in minified sources it is completely > useless as all counts() are considered the same line. > > Has this grown in popularity somewhere? Is there a good use case for it? I've seen people use console.count("method name") for some basic profiling, e.g.: function foo() { console.count("foo") ... } function bar() { console.count("bar") ... } We could draw charts for console.count: foo: 42 **************** bar: 10 **** I'd use it. I don't know where would we put this in the UI though.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 19 2016-01-11 23:39:31 PST
Comment on attachment 268697 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 268697 Committed r194887: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/194887>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 20 2016-01-11 23:39:36 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.