Bug 151336 - [JSC] Make FTLOutput's load8() and load16() compatible with B3
Summary: [JSC] Make FTLOutput's load8() and load16() compatible with B3
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New Bugs (show other bugs)
Version: WebKit Nightly Build
Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Benjamin Poulain
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-11-16 20:27 PST by Benjamin Poulain
Modified: 2015-11-17 02:40 PST (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Patch (24.63 KB, patch)
2015-11-16 20:33 PST, Benjamin Poulain 		no flags Details | Formatted Diff | Diff
Patch (24.89 KB, patch)
2015-11-16 20:40 PST, Benjamin Poulain 		no flags Details | Formatted Diff | Diff
Patch (24.92 KB, patch)
2015-11-16 21:06 PST, Benjamin Poulain 		no flags Details | Formatted Diff | Diff
Show Obsolete (3) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Benjamin Poulain 2015-11-16 20:27:34 PST 
[JSC] Make FTLOutput's load8() and load16() compatible with B3
Comment 1 Benjamin Poulain 2015-11-16 20:33:20 PST 
Created attachment 265655 [details]
Patch
Comment 2 Benjamin Poulain 2015-11-16 20:40:01 PST 
Created attachment 265656 [details]
Patch
Comment 3 Benjamin Poulain 2015-11-16 20:40:49 PST 
Comment on attachment 265656 [details]
Patch

Ooops, not for review, just for bots.
Comment 4 Benjamin Poulain 2015-11-16 21:06:04 PST 
Created attachment 265658 [details]
Patch
Comment 5 Filip Pizlo 2015-11-16 21:15:12 PST 
Comment on attachment 265658 [details]
Patch

LGTM
Comment 6 Benjamin Poulain 2015-11-16 22:20:21 PST 
Committed r192508: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/192508>
Comment 7 Csaba Osztrogonác 2015-11-17 02:40:08 PST 
Comment on attachment 265658 [details]
Patch

Cleared review? from attachment 265658 [details] so that this bug does not appear in http://webkit.org/pending-review.  If you would like this patch reviewed, please attach it to a new bug (or re-open this bug before marking it for review again).