RESOLVED FIXED 150058
Add SPI for reloading without content blockers
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150058
Summary Add SPI for reloading without content blockers
Alex Christensen
Reported 2015-10-12 15:53:36 PDT
Add SPI for reloading without content blockers
Attachments
Patch (27.71 KB, patch)
2015-10-12 15:59 PDT, Alex Christensen
no flags
Patch (27.84 KB, patch)
2015-10-12 16:02 PDT, Alex Christensen
no flags
Patch (28.80 KB, patch)
2015-10-13 16:02 PDT, Alex Christensen
no flags
Patch (30.23 KB, patch)
2015-10-14 11:39 PDT, Alex Christensen
no flags
Alex Christensen
Comment 1 2015-10-12 15:59:50 PDT
Alex Christensen
Comment 2 2015-10-12 16:02:45 PDT
Alex Christensen
Comment 3 2015-10-13 16:02:54 PDT
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 4 2015-10-13 16:04:44 PDT
Thanks for the patch. If this patch contains new public API please make sure it follows the guidelines for new WebKit2 GTK+ API. See http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKitGTK/AddingNewWebKit2API
Carlos Garcia Campos
Comment 5 2015-10-13 22:59:28 PDT
Comment on attachment 263032 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=263032&action=review > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/WebFrameProxy.cpp:251 > - page->reload(false); > + page->reload(false, true); I think this would be easier to read now if we use flags instead of booleans.
Sam Weinig
Comment 6 2015-10-14 10:20:22 PDT
(In reply to comment #5) > Comment on attachment 263032 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=263032&action=review > > > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/WebFrameProxy.cpp:251 > > - page->reload(false); > > + page->reload(false, true); > > I think this would be easier to read now if we use flags instead of booleans. Agreed. Perhaps it would be nicer for reload to take a ReloadOptions object.
Alex Christensen
Comment 7 2015-10-14 11:24:54 PDT
(In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Comment on attachment 263032 [details] > > Patch > > > > View in context: > > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=263032&action=review > > > > > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/WebFrameProxy.cpp:251 > > > - page->reload(false); > > > + page->reload(false, true); > > > > I think this would be easier to read now if we use flags instead of booleans. > > Agreed. Perhaps it would be nicer for reload to take a ReloadOptions object. I agree, but these are passed as parameters all over WebKit2 with IPC and WebCore. This is the only place that is hard to read. I think something like this would make it easier to read without requiring a newly defined type: const bool reloadFromOrigin = false; const bool contentBlockersEnabled = true; page->reload(reloadFromOrigin, contentBlockersEnabled);
Alex Christensen
Comment 8 2015-10-14 11:39:46 PDT
Alex Christensen
Comment 9 2015-10-14 11:41:22 PDT
Comment on attachment 263092 [details] Patch I named all the booleans at the call sites. That achieves the readability without mucking up the code too much. If we feel that there are too many parameters, we can wrap the bools in a struct or flags, but I think that's too invasive for this change.
Alex Christensen
Comment 10 2015-10-14 13:04:14 PDT
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.