RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 167557 149642
[Gtk] Irregular font kerning
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149642
Summary [Gtk] Irregular font kerning
Tony Houghton
Reported 2015-09-29 13:41:15 PDT
Created attachment 262101 [details] Shows irregular kerning on youtube settings page I'm using the GNOME browser (formerly known as epiphany) with webkit2gtk 2.10.0 on Debian Linux on a Macbook 13" Retina. I've applied the patch from bug #141782, but now on many pages the font kerning looks wrong, with irregular spacing between characters. I found bug #109955, but I think this is a different issue because of the different OS etc, and the custom CSS suggested there made no difference. I suspect this is another problem with accelerated rendering. Could it be anything to do with bug #146194?
Attachments
Shows irregular kerning on youtube settings page (116.16 KB, image/png)
2015-09-29 13:41 PDT, Tony Houghton
no flags
Another example of terrible font spacing in GNOME "Web" (198.04 KB, image/png)
2016-03-21 07:26 PDT, Tony Houghton
no flags
Tony Houghton
Comment 1 2016-03-21 07:26:46 PDT
Created attachment 274594 [details] Another example of terrible font spacing in GNOME "Web" This bug is still a problem in Debian with GNOME "Web" using libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 version 2.10.8-1. You can see how ugly it is. Please can somebody look into it.
Tony Houghton
Comment 2 2016-03-21 07:34:38 PDT
Strangely DevHelp doesn't appear to have this problem, despite using the same webkit-gtk package. But I think it's probably due to them using different options, and one of those options is bugged in webkit, rather than the bug being something caused specifically by Web.
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 3 2017-03-06 13:23:38 PST
Unless I'm mistaken, I don't think either of those websites are using the complex font layout path, so there would not be any kerning at all. Hence I guess this is bug #167557. Please complain if you disagree. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 167557 ***
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 4 2017-03-06 13:28:23 PST
(In reply to comment #3) > Unless I'm mistaken, I don't think either of those websites are using the > complex font layout path (Based on the fact that I can't reproduce bug #161493 on those pages.)
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.