WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED WONTFIX
149582
GCThread machinery should be release-only
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149582
Summary
GCThread machinery should be release-only
Filip Pizlo
Reported
2015-09-26 13:04:29 PDT
Patch forthcoming.
Attachments
the patch
(3.59 KB, patch)
2015-09-26 13:05 PDT
,
Filip Pizlo
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
the patch
(3.60 KB, patch)
2015-09-26 13:07 PDT
,
Filip Pizlo
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
the patch
(3.62 KB, patch)
2015-09-26 13:10 PDT
,
Filip Pizlo
mitz: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
patch for landing
(2.40 KB, patch)
2015-09-26 13:22 PDT
,
Filip Pizlo
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
patch for landing
(2.70 KB, patch)
2015-09-26 13:30 PDT
,
Filip Pizlo
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(4)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Filip Pizlo
Comment 1
2015-09-26 13:05:56 PDT
Created
attachment 261973
[details]
the patch
Filip Pizlo
Comment 2
2015-09-26 13:07:33 PDT
Created
attachment 261974
[details]
the patch
Filip Pizlo
Comment 3
2015-09-26 13:10:54 PDT
Created
attachment 261975
[details]
the patch
mitz
Comment 4
2015-09-26 13:17:32 PDT
Comment on
attachment 261975
[details]
the patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=261975&action=review
> Source/WTF/wtf/MainThread.h:71 > +inline bool isMainThreadOrGCThread() { return true; }
Since isMainThreadOrGCThread() is only used in assertions and this version is useless, can you just omit it altogether in the ASSERT_DISABLED case?
Filip Pizlo
Comment 5
2015-09-26 13:20:03 PDT
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> Comment on
attachment 261975
[details]
> the patch > > View in context: >
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=261975&action=review
> > > Source/WTF/wtf/MainThread.h:71 > > +inline bool isMainThreadOrGCThread() { return true; } > > Since isMainThreadOrGCThread() is only used in assertions and this version > is useless, can you just omit it altogether in the ASSERT_DISABLED case?
Yeah, that's better! I'll try that.
Filip Pizlo
Comment 6
2015-09-26 13:22:24 PDT
Created
attachment 261976
[details]
patch for landing
Filip Pizlo
Comment 7
2015-09-26 13:30:35 PDT
Created
attachment 261977
[details]
patch for landing
Filip Pizlo
Comment 8
2015-10-03 15:51:29 PDT
Meh, we don't need this.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug