RESOLVED FIXED 148838
Implement the relational instructions in WebAssembly
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148838
Summary Implement the relational instructions in WebAssembly
Sukolsak Sakshuwong
Reported 2015-09-04 15:48:11 PDT
Implement the relational instructions for WebAssembly files generated by pack-asmjs <https://github.com/WebAssembly/polyfill-prototype-1>.
Attachments
Patch (12.58 KB, patch)
2015-09-04 17:25 PDT, Sukolsak Sakshuwong
no flags
Patch for landing (16.51 KB, patch)
2015-09-06 15:40 PDT, Sukolsak Sakshuwong
no flags
Sukolsak Sakshuwong
Comment 1 2015-09-04 17:25:01 PDT
Saam Barati
Comment 2 2015-09-06 13:20:31 PDT
Comment on attachment 260658 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=260658&action=review r=me with comment > Source/JavaScriptCore/tests/stress/wasm-relational.js:119 > +var module = loadWebAssembly("wasm-relational.wasm"); I think it'd be nicer to have a directory in stress called "wasm" that holds all the wasm binaries were testing. Do we have other tests checked in that follow the model in this patch? Maybe it's worth changing those. Also, would it be possible to write the tests such that we can write all wasm tests in JS, and have the loadWebAssembly do the translation on the fly?
Saam Barati
Comment 3 2015-09-06 13:21:29 PDT
Doing the JS =>wasm translation on the fly will make converting to newer wasm formats much easier.
Sukolsak Sakshuwong
Comment 4 2015-09-06 15:02:15 PDT
Thanks. (In reply to comment #2) > Comment on attachment 260658 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=260658&action=review > > r=me with comment > > > Source/JavaScriptCore/tests/stress/wasm-relational.js:119 > > +var module = loadWebAssembly("wasm-relational.wasm"); > > I think it'd be nicer to have a directory in stress called "wasm" that holds > all the > wasm binaries were testing. Do we have other tests checked in that follow the > model in this patch? Maybe it's worth changing those. Will do. > Also, would it be possible to write the tests such that > we can write all wasm tests in JS, and have the loadWebAssembly do the > translation on the fly? (In reply to comment #3) > Doing the JS =>wasm translation on the fly will make > converting to newer wasm formats much easier. We will have to include the source code of pack-asmjs (~3,800 lines) and the asm.js parser that it uses (~2,900 lines.) It's probably not worth the time though, considering that eventually, we will have to implement the text format <https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/TextFormat.md>. It will be a better way to write tests, because we will have more control over what pack-asmjs generates. asm.js is only a stopgap until the spec is finalized.
Sukolsak Sakshuwong
Comment 5 2015-09-06 15:40:38 PDT
Created attachment 260720 [details] Patch for landing
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 6 2015-09-06 23:18:02 PDT
Comment on attachment 260720 [details] Patch for landing Clearing flags on attachment: 260720 Committed r189458: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/189458>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 7 2015-09-06 23:18:06 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.