Replace uses of StaticLock with Lock
Created attachment 259536 [details] Patch
Don't we need to do something like marking Lock's constructor constexpr in order to avoid a static initializer?
(In reply to comment #2) > Don't we need to do something like marking Lock's constructor constexpr in > order to avoid a static initializer? Yup. I did that (and landed those patches) but they broke the Mavericks build due to compiler bugs. I'm going to re-land the patches once we can drop Mavericks support.