WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Search+
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED CONFIGURATION CHANGED
147795
Error handling padding in box-sizing calculations
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147795
Summary
Error handling padding in box-sizing calculations
Brent Fulgham
Reported
2015-08-07 15:26:01 PDT
Created
attachment 258534
[details]
Test case showing the improper behavior WebKit seems to be taking padding into account when performing height calculations, even when in standards mode using "box-sizing: content-box".
Attachments
Test case showing the improper behavior
(657 bytes, text/html)
2015-08-07 15:26 PDT
,
Brent Fulgham
no flags
Details
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
alan
Comment 1
2015-08-13 10:54:42 PDT
Blink changed available logical height behavior about a year ago. It returns content box height now (vs. border box height)
https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?revision=178693&view=revision
@@ -3085,7 +3061,7 @@ LayoutUnit RenderBox::computeReplacedLogicalHeightUsing(Length logicalHeight) co LayoutUnit RenderBox::availableLogicalHeight(AvailableLogicalHeightType heightType) const { - return constrainLogicalHeightByMinMax(availableLogicalHeightUsing(style().logicalHeight(), heightType), -1); + return constrainContentBoxLogicalHeightByMinMax(availableLogicalHeightUsing(style().logicalHeight(), heightType), -1); }
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 2
2016-09-08 14:06:46 PDT
<
rdar://problem/28213830
>
Ahmad Saleem
Comment 3
2022-10-31 06:23:51 PDT
I am not able to reproduce this bug using Safari 16.1 and the "red" square is center similar to Chrome Canary 109 and Firefox Nightly 108. Do we need to anything else? Thanks!
Ahmad Saleem
Comment 4
2022-12-17 03:33:51 PST
Also we are passing the test (in STP160) from the Chromium patch of
Comment 01
: Test Case -
https://jsfiddle.net/0ytgLhwn/
Do we need to do anything else?
alan
Comment 5
2022-12-21 13:49:08 PST
(In reply to Ahmad Saleem from
comment #4
)
> Also we are passing the test (in STP160) from the Chromium patch of Comment > 01: > > Test Case -
https://jsfiddle.net/0ytgLhwn/
> > Do we need to do anything else?
Nope, this looks to have progressed. Thanks!
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug