We can just implement this as a "const"-like scope :)
Created attachment 258257 [details] patch
Comment on attachment 258257 [details] patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=258257&action=review r=me with fixes. Do we already have test coverage for all the aspects of the function name scope behavior? If not, please add the missing pieces. > Source/JavaScriptCore/ChangeLog:14 > + this variable like a "const" because You're cut off here mid thought.
(In reply to comment #2) > Comment on attachment 258257 [details] > patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=258257&action=review > > r=me with fixes. > > Do we already have test coverage for all the aspects of the function name > scope behavior? If not, please add the missing pieces. > We do have tests. I broke them and then fixed them :) > > Source/JavaScriptCore/ChangeLog:14 > > + this variable like a "const" because > > You're cut off here mid thought. Fixed.
landed in: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/187969