Bug 145357 – :matches incorrectly matches pseudo elements

• Status: RESOLVED
• Resolution: DUPLICATE
• Component: CSS

[Elliott Sprehn]

http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors-4/#matches

The spec says:
"Pseudo-elements cannot be represented by the matches-any pseudo-class; they are not valid within :matches()."

<style>
div:matches(::before, ::after) {
    content: "Should not match.";
}
</style>

<div></div>

[Yusuke Suzuki]

Hi Benjamin, do you have any thought about this?

Is this a solid decision in css-wg, or still controversial?
If it's a solid decision, we should drop this feature.
But if it's still discussed and not mature yet, we should keep it until we meet the consensus.

[Benjamin Poulain]

Last time we talked about this, the CSSWG was still bikesheding on the definition of pseudo elements.

Given how insanely bad the CSSWG is, and the value of this feature, I am ok with keeping this "bug" around.

[Elliott Sprehn]

(In reply to comment #2)
> Last time we talked about this, the CSSWG was still bikesheding on the
> definition of pseudo elements.
> 
> Given how insanely bad the CSSWG is, and the value of this feature, I am ok
> with keeping this "bug" around.

That just means content will depend on it and then other browsers will need to copy your unspec'ed behavior.

[Benjamin Poulain]

(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Last time we talked about this, the CSSWG was still bikesheding on the
> > definition of pseudo elements.
> > 
> > Given how insanely bad the CSSWG is, and the value of this feature, I am ok
> > with keeping this "bug" around.
> 
> That just means content will depend on it and then other browsers will need
> to copy your unspec'ed behavior.

We made a proposal for a formal definition several months ago.

[Antti Koivisto]

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 206654 ***