RESOLVED FIXED 134984
Add WebSecurityOrigin "webSecurityOriginFromDatabaseIdentifier" SPI and change _websiteDataURLForContainerWithURL: SPI
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134984
Summary Add WebSecurityOrigin "webSecurityOriginFromDatabaseIdentifier" SPI and chang...
Brady Eidson
Reported 2014-07-16 10:07:45 PDT
Add WebSecurityOrigin "webSecurityOriginFromDatabaseIdentifier" SPI <rdar://problem/17454712>
Attachments
Patch v1 (7.48 KB, application/octet-stream)
2014-07-16 10:11 PDT, Brady Eidson
no flags
Patch 2 v1 (3.93 KB, patch)
2014-07-16 10:15 PDT, Brady Eidson
no flags
Patch 1 v2 (7.48 KB, patch)
2014-07-16 10:17 PDT, Brady Eidson
no flags
Patch v3 (13.52 KB, patch)
2014-07-16 13:43 PDT, Brady Eidson
no flags
Patch v4 (13.51 KB, patch)
2014-07-16 16:13 PDT, Brady Eidson
mitz: review+
Patch v5 - Reintroduce the old removed SPI (leaving everything else about the already landed patch the same) (2.03 KB, patch)
2014-07-16 20:28 PDT, Brady Eidson
ddkilzer: review+
Brady Eidson
Comment 1 2014-07-16 10:11:52 PDT
Created attachment 235002 [details] Patch v1
Brady Eidson
Comment 2 2014-07-16 10:15:16 PDT
Created attachment 235003 [details] Patch 2 v1 A patch for separate review to land at the same time.
Brady Eidson
Comment 3 2014-07-16 10:17:41 PDT
Created attachment 235004 [details] Patch 1 v2 Weird encoding issue preventing review? Trying again...
Brady Eidson
Comment 4 2014-07-16 12:38:44 PDT
An additional change is needed. Will combine these two patches with that change when uploading a new patch soon.
Brady Eidson
Comment 5 2014-07-16 13:41:46 PDT
Retitled to: Add WebSecurityOrigin "webSecurityOriginFromDatabaseIdentifier" SPI and change _websiteDataURLForContainerWithURL: SPI
Brady Eidson
Comment 6 2014-07-16 13:43:25 PDT
Created attachment 235018 [details] Patch v3
mitz
Comment 7 2014-07-16 14:18:12 PDT
Comment on attachment 235018 [details] Patch v3 View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=235018&action=review > Source/WebKit/mac/WebCoreSupport/WebSecurityOrigin.mm:48 > + return [[WebSecurityOrigin alloc] _initWithWebCoreSecurityOrigin:origin.get()]; Based on the method’s name (and lack of annotations in its declaration), this should be autoreleased. > Source/WebKit/mac/WebCoreSupport/WebSecurityOriginPrivate.h:37 > ++ (id)webSecurityOriginFromDatabaseIdentifier:(NSString *)databaseIdentifier; Could use a newline above this. > Source/WebKit2/DatabaseProcess/DatabaseProcess.cpp:102 > + // ********* > + // IMPORTANT: Do not change the directory structure for indexed databases on disk without first consulting a reviewer from Apple (<rdar://problem/17454712>) > + // ********* I don’t think this comment is appropriate. In principle, we shouldn’t change the location and structure of any persistent user data between WebKit versions. > Source/WebKit2/DatabaseProcess/IndexedDB/UniqueIDBDatabase.cpp:67 > + // ********* > + // IMPORTANT: Do not change the directory structure for indexed databases on disk without first consulting a reviewer from Apple (<rdar://problem/17454712>) > + // ********* Ditto. > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/Cocoa/WKProcessPoolPrivate.h:47 > -+ (NSURL *)_websiteDataURLForContainerWithURL:(NSURL *)containerURL; > ++ (NSURL *)_websiteDataURLForContainerWithURL:(NSURL *)containerURL bundleIdentifierIfNotInContainer:(NSString *)bundleIdentifier; Why cram two APIs into one? I think you want to add something like + (NSURL *)_websiteDataURLForApplicationWithBundleIdentifier:
Brady Eidson
Comment 8 2014-07-16 15:57:09 PDT
(In reply to comment #7) > (From update of attachment 235018 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=235018&action=review > > > Source/WebKit/mac/WebCoreSupport/WebSecurityOrigin.mm:48 > > + return [[WebSecurityOrigin alloc] _initWithWebCoreSecurityOrigin:origin.get()]; > > Based on the method’s name (and lack of annotations in its declaration), this should be autoreleased. Yup. > > Source/WebKit/mac/WebCoreSupport/WebSecurityOriginPrivate.h:37 > > ++ (id)webSecurityOriginFromDatabaseIdentifier:(NSString *)databaseIdentifier; > > Could use a newline above this. Sounds good. > > Source/WebKit2/DatabaseProcess/DatabaseProcess.cpp:102 > > + // ********* > > + // IMPORTANT: Do not change the directory structure for indexed databases on disk without first consulting a reviewer from Apple (<rdar://problem/17454712>) > > + // ********* > > I don’t think this comment is appropriate. In principle, we shouldn’t change the location and structure of any persistent user data between WebKit versions. > > > Source/WebKit2/DatabaseProcess/IndexedDB/UniqueIDBDatabase.cpp:67 > > + // ********* > > + // IMPORTANT: Do not change the directory structure for indexed databases on disk without first consulting a reviewer from Apple (<rdar://problem/17454712>) > > + // ********* > > Ditto. These comments were directly requested by another Apple reviewer that I agree with. > > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/Cocoa/WKProcessPoolPrivate.h:47 > > -+ (NSURL *)_websiteDataURLForContainerWithURL:(NSURL *)containerURL; > > ++ (NSURL *)_websiteDataURLForContainerWithURL:(NSURL *)containerURL bundleIdentifierIfNotInContainer:(NSString *)bundleIdentifier; > > Why cram two APIs into one? I think you want to add something like > + (NSURL *)_websiteDataURLForApplicationWithBundleIdentifier: The new form still needs to take the container URL and bundleID. I can add a second form instead of overriding the first, but it does need both arguments.
Brady Eidson
Comment 9 2014-07-16 16:13:11 PDT
Created attachment 235033 [details] Patch v4 On IRC Dan and I hashed out the _websiteDataURLForContainerWithURL: change. Made the other requested changes here in Patch v4. The comments need to stay, but don't need to remain in the exact same form they're currently in.
Brady Eidson
Comment 10 2014-07-16 20:24:08 PDT
Landed that patch in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/171160 But we're going to keep the old SPI around, too. Patch for that forthcoming.
Brady Eidson
Comment 11 2014-07-16 20:28:00 PDT
Created attachment 235047 [details] Patch v5 - Reintroduce the old removed SPI (leaving everything else about the already landed patch the same)
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 12 2014-07-16 20:30:01 PDT
Comment on attachment 235047 [details] Patch v5 - Reintroduce the old removed SPI (leaving everything else about the already landed patch the same) r=me
Brady Eidson
Comment 13 2014-07-16 20:32:14 PDT
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.