WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Search+
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED CONFIGURATION CHANGED
132735
WebKit computed/fitted image size differs from Blink and Gecko
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132735
Summary
WebKit computed/fitted image size differs from Blink and Gecko
Nicholas Shanks
Reported
2014-05-09 03:23:29 PDT
The CSS is something like: max-width: 100%; height: auto; And the container is some non-integral width smaller than the intrinsic image size (197×131). (It may be possible to reduce this to just {width:157.9px;height:auto} though I haven't tried) The event images on the linked page are sized as follows in a wide window: Safari 7.0 (9537.71): 157 × 104 Chrome 34.0.1847.131: 158 × 105 (computed at 157.984 × 105.047) Firefox 29.0: 158 × 105 It would appear that Chrome and Firefox are computing the height from the computed width, then snapping both width and height to the nearest whole pixel. Safari seems to be rounding the width down (i.e. floor() not round()) then computing the height from the floored width. This ends up with safari being 1px shorter and narrower than the other two. Cannot test in IE. Opera ought to be the same as Chrome. So to fix this, two changes need to be made: 1) Compute the height from the un-rounded width. 2) Round rather than floor the dimensions to the nearest pixel.
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Ahmad Saleem
Comment 1
2025-02-21 21:17:18 PST
Took Wayback Archive copy -
https://web.archive.org/web/20140705042012/http://www.roh.org.uk/events
Width - 158px Height - 105.0625px So it seems like it is fixed. Marking this as 'Configuration Changed'. Tested using Safari 18.3.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug