WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Search+
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
131359
[GTK] Remove WebKit1 unit tests
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131359
Summary
[GTK] Remove WebKit1 unit tests
Martin Robinson
Reported
2014-04-08 07:34:46 PDT
After
r166504
we no longer run WebKit1 unit tests, so we can remove the Skipped lines for them.
Attachments
Patch
(1.71 KB, patch)
2014-04-08 07:37 PDT
,
Martin Robinson
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(374.36 KB, patch)
2014-04-08 09:19 PDT
,
Martin Robinson
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Martin Robinson
Comment 1
2014-04-08 07:37:29 PDT
Created
attachment 228834
[details]
Patch
Daniel Bates
Comment 2
2014-04-08 07:54:02 PDT
Comment on
attachment 228834
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=228834&action=review
> Tools/ChangeLog:7 > +
For your consideration I suggest repeating or rephrasing the bug description as the description in the ChangeLog entry so as to explain the reason for these removals. Maybe something like: Following <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/166504
> we can remove the skipped WebKit1 unit tests as we no longer run the WebKit1 unit tests by default. I'm assuming it doesn't make sense to keep these skipped test entries even if you can explicitly run the WebKit1 unit tests.
Martin Robinson
Comment 3
2014-04-08 08:06:29 PDT
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> (From update of
attachment 228834
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=228834&action=review
> > > Tools/ChangeLog:7 > > + > > For your consideration I suggest repeating or rephrasing the bug description as the description in the ChangeLog entry so as to explain the reason for these removals. Maybe something like: > > Following <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/166504
> we can remove the skipped WebKit1 unit tests as we no longer run the WebKit1 unit tests by default.
Sure. I can add the description to the ChangeLog.
> I'm assuming it doesn't make sense to keep these skipped test entries even if you can explicitly run the WebKit1 unit tests.
Yes, while you can still run the unit tests manually, they will soon be removed. I think the fact that they were not removed from the unit tests script is just an oversight or Carlos wanted to do it in pieces. Perhaps it does make sense to remove them from this script only while removing them completely though. I'll rework the patch.
Carlos Garcia Campos
Comment 4
2014-04-08 08:09:25 PDT
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (In reply to
comment #2
) > > (From update of
attachment 228834
[details]
[details]) > > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=228834&action=review
> > > > > Tools/ChangeLog:7 > > > + > > > > For your consideration I suggest repeating or rephrasing the bug description as the description in the ChangeLog entry so as to explain the reason for these removals. Maybe something like: > > > > Following <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/166504
> we can remove the skipped WebKit1 unit tests as we no longer run the WebKit1 unit tests by default. > > Sure. I can add the description to the ChangeLog. > > > I'm assuming it doesn't make sense to keep these skipped test entries even if you can explicitly run the WebKit1 unit tests. > > Yes, while you can still run the unit tests manually, they will soon be removed. I think the fact that they were not removed from the unit tests script is just an oversight or Carlos wanted to do it in pieces. Perhaps it does make sense to remove them from this script only while removing them completely though. I'll rework the patch.
I forgot to remove the skipped tests
Martin Robinson
Comment 5
2014-04-08 09:19:37 PDT
Created
attachment 228842
[details]
Patch
Martin Robinson
Comment 6
2014-04-08 16:36:59 PDT
Committed
r166977
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/166977
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug