NEW131288
The DFG should fold ~~x just like x|0.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131288
Summary The DFG should fold ~~x just like x|0.
Filip Pizlo
Reported 2014-04-06 20:03:23 PDT
... (Yes, srsly, this is a thing.)
Attachments
Patch (4.68 KB, patch)
2014-11-17 16:33 PST, Andreas Kling
no flags
Patch II (6.69 KB, patch)
2014-11-17 16:57 PST, Andreas Kling
fpizlo: review-
Andreas Kling
Comment 1 2014-11-17 16:33:46 PST
Created attachment 241748 [details] Patch First DFG patch, please don't be gentle.
Geoffrey Garen
Comment 2 2014-11-17 16:51:32 PST
Comment on attachment 241748 [details] Patch Would be nice to use the convertToIdentityOverChild* helper, by changing the helper to accept an explicit Node* argument.
Andreas Kling
Comment 3 2014-11-17 16:57:36 PST
Created attachment 241752 [details] Patch II Tweak the helper per Geoff's suggestion.
Filip Pizlo
Comment 4 2014-11-17 17:12:53 PST
Comment on attachment 241752 [details] Patch II I bet you this is wrong for this code: var tmp = ~x var y = tmp + 1 var z = ~tmp print(y + ", " + z) And also it's wrong for this case: var tmp = ~x o.f // make the DFG optimize this for some structure and then call with a different structure var y = ~tmp print(y)
Geoffrey Garen
Comment 5 2014-11-18 11:17:48 PST
I think the right answer here is to change the current XOR node to an identity node over its XOR child's child, but to leave its XOR child node unchanged, in case that child has other uses in the graph.
Filip Pizlo
Comment 6 2015-03-23 08:30:37 PDT
(In reply to comment #5) > I think the right answer here is to change the current XOR node to an > identity node over its XOR child's child, but to leave its XOR child node > unchanged, in case that child has other uses in the graph. Yup, that would do it. It's worth noting that in the FTL, ~~ will get folded by LLVM, and LLVM will not have this problem since the at-exit use of the first Xor will be explicit. So the value of this optimization on our side is mainly canonicalization: being able to see that ~~x is actually the same as x after an int check. And leaving the original Xor is a fine way to approach this.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.