[EFL][WK2] Rename async APIs for better consistency with EFL

[Ryuan Choi]

We'd better to remove Async keyword from the APIs for the consistency.

[Ryuan Choi]

Like https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-efl/2014-March/000583.html,

We'd better to follow EFL style more for the async APIs.

[Ryuan Choi]

Created attachment 227006 [details]
Patch

[Gyuyoung Kim]

Comment on attachment 227006 [details]
Patch

r=me based on efl mailing list discussion.

[Jinwoo Song]

Comment on attachment 227006 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=227006&action=review

> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_application_cache_manager.cpp:45
> +struct Get_Origins_Async_Data {

*Ewk_Application_Cache_Origins_Async_Data* seems to be more clear.

> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_cookie_manager.cpp:195
>  struct Get_Hostnames_Async_Data {

*Ewk_Cookie_Manager_Hostnames_Async_Data*?

> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_database_manager.cpp:66
>  struct Ewk_Database_Origins_Async_Get_Context {

*Ewk_Database_Origins_Async_Data*?

> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_storage_manager.cpp:66
>  struct Ewk_Storage_Origins_Async_Get_Context {

*Ewk_Storage_Origins_Async_Data*?

[Ryuan Choi]

(In reply to comment #4)
> (From update of attachment 227006 [details])
> View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=227006&action=review
> 
> > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_application_cache_manager.cpp:45
> > +struct Get_Origins_Async_Data {
> 
> *Ewk_Application_Cache_Origins_Async_Data* seems to be more clear.
> 
> > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_cookie_manager.cpp:195
> >  struct Get_Hostnames_Async_Data {
> 
> *Ewk_Cookie_Manager_Hostnames_Async_Data*?
> 
> > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_database_manager.cpp:66
> >  struct Ewk_Database_Origins_Async_Get_Context {
> 
> *Ewk_Database_Origins_Async_Data*?
> 
> > Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_storage_manager.cpp:66
> >  struct Ewk_Storage_Origins_Async_Get_Context {
> 
> *Ewk_Storage_Origins_Async_Data*?

Like discussed in IRC, I agree that it looks ugly but I am not sure whether I can rename them in this bug.

gyuyoung, what do you think about it?

If I can rename them in this bug, I will rebase the patch.

[Gyuyoung Kim]

Comment on attachment 227006 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=227006&action=review

>>> Source/WebKit2/UIProcess/API/efl/ewk_application_cache_manager.cpp:45
>>> +struct Get_Origins_Async_Data {
>> 
>> *Ewk_Application_Cache_Origins_Async_Data* seems to be more clear.
> 
> Like discussed in IRC, I agree that it looks ugly but I am not sure whether I can rename them in this bug.
> 
> gyuyoung, what do you think about it?
> 
> If I can rename them in this bug, I will rebase the patch.

I don't mind to rename these in this patch together.

[Ryuan Choi]

Created attachment 227137 [details]
Patch

[Jinwoo Song]

Comment on attachment 227137 [details]
Patch

Thanks for renaming the structures. Much better!

[WebKit Commit Bot]

Comment on attachment 227137 [details]
Patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 227137

Committed r165864: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/165864>

[WebKit Commit Bot]

All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.