WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
129170
Add extra space to op_call and related opcodes
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129170
Summary
Add extra space to op_call and related opcodes
Oliver Hunt
Reported
2014-02-21 14:23:16 PST
Add extra space to op_call and related opcodes
Attachments
Patch
(10.31 KB, patch)
2014-02-21 14:25 PST
,
Oliver Hunt
mark.lam
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Oliver Hunt
Comment 1
2014-02-21 14:25:16 PST
Created
attachment 224908
[details]
Patch
Mark Lam
Comment 2
2014-02-21 14:28:26 PST
Comment on
attachment 224908
[details]
Patch r=me
Daniel Bates
Comment 3
2014-02-21 14:29:31 PST
Comment on
attachment 224908
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=224908&action=review
> Source/JavaScriptCore/ChangeLog:9 > + slot to the op_call instructions, and refactoring to make simlar
Nit: simlar => similar
Daniel Bates
Comment 4
2014-02-21 14:30:06 PST
Comment on
attachment 224908
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=224908&action=review
> Source/JavaScriptCore/ChangeLog:10 > + changes easier in future.
Nit: "in future" => "in the future"
Oliver Hunt
Comment 5
2014-02-21 14:32:19 PST
Committed
r164503
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/164503
>
Filip Pizlo
Comment 6
2014-02-21 18:12:16 PST
Why? Did you test performance? Inlining is based on bytecode size, and you just made everything larger.
Oliver Hunt
Comment 7
2014-02-21 20:26:11 PST
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> Why? > > Did you test performance? Inlining is based on bytecode size, and you just made everything larger.
Because call_var_args needs an extra argument, i didn't think about the performance impact because i forgot that inlining was based on # of operands rather than # of opcodes. I'll see if i can fix this, or alternatively just remove the requirement that call_var_args be the same size as all the other calls.
Filip Pizlo
Comment 8
2014-02-21 21:12:09 PST
(In reply to
comment #7
)
> (In reply to
comment #6
) > > Why? > > > > Did you test performance? Inlining is based on bytecode size, and you just made everything larger. > > Because call_var_args needs an extra argument, i didn't think about the performance impact because i forgot that inlining was based on # of operands rather than # of opcodes. > > I'll see if i can fix this, or alternatively just remove the requirement that call_var_args be the same size as all the other calls.
I think it's enough to just measure it and make sure that nothing broke
Oliver Hunt
Comment 9
2014-02-21 21:38:59 PST
(In reply to
comment #8
)
> (In reply to
comment #7
) > > (In reply to
comment #6
) > > > Why? > > > > > > Did you test performance? Inlining is based on bytecode size, and you just made everything larger. > > > > Because call_var_args needs an extra argument, i didn't think about the performance impact because i forgot that inlining was based on # of operands rather than # of opcodes. > > > > I'll see if i can fix this, or alternatively just remove the requirement that call_var_args be the same size as all the other calls. > > I think it's enough to just measure it and make sure that nothing broke
kk
Oliver Hunt
Comment 10
2014-02-22 13:26:39 PST
(In reply to
comment #8
)
> (In reply to
comment #7
) > > (In reply to
comment #6
) > > > Why? > > > > > > Did you test performance? Inlining is based on bytecode size, and you just made everything larger. > > > > Because call_var_args needs an extra argument, i didn't think about the performance impact because i forgot that inlining was based on # of operands rather than # of opcodes. > > > > I'll see if i can fix this, or alternatively just remove the requirement that call_var_args be the same size as all the other calls. > > I think it's enough to just measure it and make sure that nothing broke
I don't see a regression under jsc on my MBP. Just about to run the DRT hosted version.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug