RESOLVED FIXED 128974
WebGL EXT_blend_minmax may now be implemented
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128974
Summary WebGL EXT_blend_minmax may now be implemented
Florian Bösch
Reported 2014-02-18 07:44:55 PST
The EXT_blend_minmax extension has been moved to draft and vendors are now encouraged to consider implementation. Chrome ticket: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=344451 Firefox ticket: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=973815
Attachments
patch (29.14 KB, patch)
2014-12-12 12:30 PST, Roger Fong
dino: review+
Florian Bösch
Comment 1 2014-07-04 04:01:09 PDT
The status of the EXT_blend_minmax extension has changed from draft to community approved.
Roger Fong
Comment 2 2014-12-09 12:12:39 PST
Done by chrome and firefox already.
Roger Fong
Comment 3 2014-12-09 14:01:31 PST
Roger Fong
Comment 4 2014-12-12 12:30:11 PST
Dean Jackson
Comment 5 2014-12-12 13:38:54 PST
Comment on attachment 243211 [details] patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=243211&action=review > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:11 > + Tested by: > + webgl/1.0.3/conformance/extensions/ext-blend-minmax.html > + fast/canvas/webgl/constants.html This is another one that is skipped by default. I think we should copy it in to fast/canvas/webgl or have a 1.0.3-ready directory with the non-skipped tests. What do you think? > Source/WebCore/WebCore.vcxproj/WebCore.vcxproj:18991 > <ClInclude Include="..\html\canvas\EXTFragDepth.hâ /> > + <ClInclude Include="..\html\canvas\EXTBlendMinMax.hâ /> Are these smart quotes or something?
Roger Fong
Comment 6 2014-12-12 13:42:35 PST
(In reply to comment #5) > Comment on attachment 243211 [details] > patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=243211&action=review > > > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:11 > > + Tested by: > > + webgl/1.0.3/conformance/extensions/ext-blend-minmax.html > > + fast/canvas/webgl/constants.html > > This is another one that is skipped by default. I think we should copy it in > to fast/canvas/webgl or have a 1.0.3-ready directory with the non-skipped > tests. What do you think? So I actually unskipped that test on trunk but there are two different modes for the test. One where the extension is disabled and one when it's not. So it was passing before because the extension wasn't enabled, and now it's still passing but running a different set of tests because it's enabled. > > > Source/WebCore/WebCore.vcxproj/WebCore.vcxproj:18991 > > <ClInclude Include="..\html\canvas\EXTFragDepth.hâ /> > > + <ClInclude Include="..\html\canvas\EXTBlendMinMax.hâ /> > > Are these smart quotes or something? o.0 guess so, odd that the first ones aren't.
Roger Fong
Comment 7 2014-12-12 13:44:07 PST
> > So I actually unskipped that test on trunk but there are two different modes > for the test. One where the extension is disabled and one when it's not. > So it was passing before because the extension wasn't enabled, and now it's > still passing but running a different set of tests because it's enabled. > Maybe this means we need another test to test which extensions are enabled?
Roger Fong
Comment 8 2014-12-12 13:58:11 PST
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.