Bug 128789 - A number of js/regress tests simply take way too long to run in debug on Windows and should be skipped for now
Summary: A number of js/regress tests simply take way too long to run in debug on Wind...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Tools / Tests (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Nobody
URL:
Keywords: LayoutTestFailure
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-02-13 18:12 PST by Roger Fong
Modified: 2015-01-27 11:20 PST (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Roger Fong 2014-02-13 18:12:40 PST
For example, one test has the following code.
var cycles = 20000
var numberObject = Number
function foo() {
    var result = 0;
    var innerCycles = cycles;
    var Number = numberObject;
    for (var i = 0; i < innerCycles; ++i)
        result += 0 | isNaN(Number.NaN);

    return result;
}

Perhaps we should consider decreasing the number of cycles. It has no issue, if I set the cycles to say, 2000.

  js/regress/Int16Array-bubble-sort-with-byteLength.html [ Timeout ]
  js/regress/Int16Array-bubble-sort.html [ Timeout ]
  js/regress/chain-custom-getter.html [ Timeout ]
  js/regress/chain-getter-access.html [ Timeout ]
  js/regress/marsaglia.html [ Timeout ]
  js/regress/proto-custom-getter.html [ Timeout ]
  js/regress/proto-getter-access.html [ Timeout ]
  js/regress/simple-custom-getter.html [ Timeout ]
  js/regress/simple-getter-access.html [ Timeout ]]

Skipping for now
Comment 1 Roger Fong 2014-02-13 18:15:51 PST
I don't know when this regressed.
It seems to be fine on release.