RESOLVED FIXED 128316
IDB: storage/indexeddb/create-index-with-integer-keys.html fails
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128316
Summary IDB: storage/indexeddb/create-index-with-integer-keys.html fails
Brady Eidson
Reported 2014-02-06 10:24:08 PST
IDB: storage/indexeddb/create-index-with-integer-keys.html fails The test creates an object store, puts a record in the object store, creates an index, then opens an index cursor. The index cursor is supposed to represent that record in the object store, but comes up undefined. We don't write index records for indexes that are created *after* a record is put in its referenced object store. Doh!
Attachments
Patch v1 - Figure out the index keys to write in the DatabaseProcess as part of the createIndex operation itself. (46.17 KB, patch)
2014-02-06 23:25 PST, Brady Eidson
no flags
Patch v2 - Fix style (46.15 KB, patch)
2014-02-06 23:26 PST, Brady Eidson
ggaren: review+
ggaren: commit-queue-
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 1 2014-02-06 10:24:42 PST
Brady Eidson
Comment 2 2014-02-06 12:28:09 PST
Populating an index if it is created after an object store already has records is what "IndexPopulator" is about. That mechanism is still nuts, though. We're going to do this way better.
Brady Eidson
Comment 3 2014-02-06 17:06:21 PST
Have this working in a sane manner with a little JSC in the DatabaseProcess. Working out a kink in the patch (the test still has one wrong result) then I'll post for review.
Brady Eidson
Comment 4 2014-02-06 23:25:13 PST
Created attachment 223428 [details] Patch v1 - Figure out the index keys to write in the DatabaseProcess as part of the createIndex operation itself.
Brady Eidson
Comment 5 2014-02-06 23:26:43 PST
Created attachment 223429 [details] Patch v2 - Fix style
Geoffrey Garen
Comment 6 2014-02-07 10:14:32 PST
Comment on attachment 223429 [details] Patch v2 - Fix style View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=223429&action=review r=me > Source/WebCore/Modules/indexeddb/IDBObjectStore.cpp:208 > + for (auto i : keyDatas) This should be "auto&" to avoid an apparent copy. > Source/WebCore/Modules/indexeddb/IDBObjectStore.cpp:209 > + keys.append(i.maybeCreateIDBKey()); Let's null check before append to avoid a nullptr dereference later. > Source/WebCore/Modules/indexeddb/IDBObjectStore.cpp:329 > + indexKeys.append(i.maybeCreateIDBKey()); Let's null check before append to avoid a nullptr dereference later. > Source/WebCore/bindings/js/IDBBindingUtilities.cpp:355 > + if (!indexKey->isValid()) > + return; Maybe we should check isValid in both cases -- maybe up at the top, by the nullptr check? It seems that an array key can be invalid, so I guess we should check it. > Source/WebCore/bindings/js/IDBBindingUtilities.cpp:363 > + for (auto i : indexKey->array()) auto&? > Source/WebKit2/DatabaseProcess/IndexedDB/sqlite/UniqueIDBDatabaseBackingStoreSQLite.cpp:646 > + for (auto indexKey : indexKeys) { auto&? > Source/WebKit2/DatabaseProcess/IndexedDB/sqlite/UniqueIDBDatabaseBackingStoreSQLite.h:117 > + OwnPtr<JSC::JSGlobalObject> m_globalObject; Please use JSC::Strong. It's like OwnPtr, but for GC instead of malloc. Otherwise, crash-o.
Brady Eidson
Comment 7 2014-02-07 10:22:36 PST
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.