RESOLVED FIXED 125771
Add a simple register allocator to WebCore for x86_64
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125771
Summary Add a simple register allocator to WebCore for x86_64
Benjamin Poulain
Reported 2013-12-16 01:40:46 PST
Add a simple register allocator to WebCore for x86_64
Attachments
Patch (11.92 KB, patch)
2013-12-16 01:47 PST, Benjamin Poulain
ggaren: review+
Benjamin Poulain
Comment 1 2013-12-16 01:47:15 PST
Geoffrey Garen
Comment 2 2013-12-16 15:52:50 PST
Comment on attachment 219303 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=219303&action=review r=me > Source/WebCore/cssjit/RegisterAllocator.h:51 > + void reserveRegister(JSC::MacroAssembler::RegisterID registerID) I think you could call this "allocateRegister". It fits nicely in the C++ function overloading model: The extra argument explains the difference in behavior from the version of allocateRegister that doesn't take an argument. > Source/WebCore/cssjit/RegisterAllocator.h:63 > + void returnRegister(JSC::MacroAssembler::RegisterID registerID) I would call this "deallocateRegister", to match more closely with "allocateRegister". > Source/WebCore/cssjit/RegisterAllocator.h:66 > + m_allocatedRegisters.remove(m_allocatedRegisters.reverseFind(registerID)); I think you should add a comment here explaining that we use reverseFind because we almost always return registers in a stack-like order. > Source/WebCore/cssjit/RegisterAllocator.h:110 > + m_registers.append(JSC::X86Registers::eax); > + m_registers.append(JSC::X86Registers::ecx); > + m_registers.append(JSC::X86Registers::esi); > + m_registers.append(JSC::X86Registers::edi); > + m_registers.append(JSC::X86Registers::r8); > + m_registers.append(JSC::X86Registers::r9); > + m_registers.append(JSC::X86Registers::r10); > + m_registers.append(JSC::X86Registers::r11); I think this would be clearer if: (a) The list of registers were in a static const array, and you looped over the array, calling append; and (b) You added a comment explaining that these are the caller-save registers, and we use them because we want to avoid saving registers at the head of our JITed function.
Benjamin Poulain
Comment 3 2013-12-17 02:36:26 PST
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.