Fix a silly mistake of r160467
Created attachment 219121 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 219121 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=219121&action=review > Source/WebCore/platform/network/cf/ResourceHandleCFURLConnectionDelegateWithOperationQueue.cpp:136 > + if (!!protector->hasHandle()) { Can we just use "if (protector->hasHandle())"? > Source/WebCore/platform/network/cf/ResourceHandleCFURLConnectionDelegateWithOperationQueue.cpp:164 > - if (!protector->hasHandle()) { > + if (!!protector->hasHandle()) { Ditto > Source/WebCore/platform/network/cf/ResourceHandleCFURLConnectionDelegateWithOperationQueue.cpp:197 > + if (!!protector->hasHandle()) { Ditto. > Source/WebCore/platform/network/cf/ResourceHandleCFURLConnectionDelegateWithOperationQueue.cpp:272 > + if (!!protector->hasHandle()) { Ditto
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 219121 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=219121&action=review > > > Source/WebCore/platform/network/cf/ResourceHandleCFURLConnectionDelegateWithOperationQueue.cpp:136 > > + if (!!protector->hasHandle()) { > > Can we just use "if (protector->hasHandle())"? Of course :) Will fix.
Committed r160525: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/160525>