RESOLVED FIXED 125657
Fix a silly mistake of r160467
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125657
Summary Fix a silly mistake of r160467
Benjamin Poulain
Reported 2013-12-12 14:40:01 PST
Fix a silly mistake of r160467
Attachments
Patch (7.56 KB, patch)
2013-12-12 14:41 PST, Benjamin Poulain
ap: review+
Benjamin Poulain
Comment 1 2013-12-12 14:41:16 PST
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 2 2013-12-12 15:04:26 PST
Comment on attachment 219121 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=219121&action=review > Source/WebCore/platform/network/cf/ResourceHandleCFURLConnectionDelegateWithOperationQueue.cpp:136 > + if (!!protector->hasHandle()) { Can we just use "if (protector->hasHandle())"? > Source/WebCore/platform/network/cf/ResourceHandleCFURLConnectionDelegateWithOperationQueue.cpp:164 > - if (!protector->hasHandle()) { > + if (!!protector->hasHandle()) { Ditto > Source/WebCore/platform/network/cf/ResourceHandleCFURLConnectionDelegateWithOperationQueue.cpp:197 > + if (!!protector->hasHandle()) { Ditto. > Source/WebCore/platform/network/cf/ResourceHandleCFURLConnectionDelegateWithOperationQueue.cpp:272 > + if (!!protector->hasHandle()) { Ditto
Benjamin Poulain
Comment 3 2013-12-12 16:29:17 PST
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 219121 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=219121&action=review > > > Source/WebCore/platform/network/cf/ResourceHandleCFURLConnectionDelegateWithOperationQueue.cpp:136 > > + if (!!protector->hasHandle()) { > > Can we just use "if (protector->hasHandle())"? Of course :) Will fix.
Benjamin Poulain
Comment 4 2013-12-12 19:50:42 PST
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.