WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
125527
Clean up SVGScriptElement
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125527
Summary
Clean up SVGScriptElement
Rob Buis
Reported
2013-12-10 11:49:10 PST
There seems to be no need for m_type or the type getter/setters to be there.
Attachments
Patch
(5.13 KB, patch)
2013-12-10 11:54 PST
,
Rob Buis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(3.58 KB, patch)
2013-12-10 13:46 PST
,
Rob Buis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(3.15 KB, patch)
2013-12-12 14:24 PST
,
Rob Buis
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(5.97 KB, patch)
2013-12-12 15:52 PST
,
Rob Buis
darin
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(3)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Rob Buis
Comment 1
2013-12-10 11:54:25 PST
Created
attachment 218888
[details]
Patch
Sam Weinig
Comment 2
2013-12-10 13:05:19 PST
Comment on
attachment 218888
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=218888&action=review
> Source/WebCore/svg/SVGScriptElement.idl:29 > + [TreatNullAs=NullString, ImplementedAs=typeAttributeValue] attribute DOMString type;
Can this use Reflect?
Rob Buis
Comment 3
2013-12-10 13:38:24 PST
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> (From update of
attachment 218888
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=218888&action=review
> > > Source/WebCore/svg/SVGScriptElement.idl:29 > > + [TreatNullAs=NullString, ImplementedAs=typeAttributeValue] attribute DOMString type; > > Can this use Reflect?
Hi Sam, I was concerned that Reflect would not be able to tell it is the svg type attribute, not the html type attribute, but it is. Will make a new patch.
Rob Buis
Comment 4
2013-12-10 13:46:19 PST
Created
attachment 218904
[details]
Patch
Sam Weinig
Comment 5
2013-12-10 13:51:56 PST
Comment on
attachment 218904
[details]
Patch r=me
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 6
2013-12-10 14:25:07 PST
Comment on
attachment 218904
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 218904 Committed
r160389
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/160389
>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 7
2013-12-10 14:25:10 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Darin Adler
Comment 8
2013-12-12 00:03:15 PST
Comment on
attachment 218904
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=218904&action=review
> Source/WebCore/svg/SVGScriptElement.idl:29 > + [TreatNullAs=NullString, Reflect] attribute DOMString type;
This is more than a cleanup. It’s a bug fix. The old setter code would not set the content attribute when you set the type attribute from JavaScript. The reverse would work, setting the content attribute would affect what you see from JavaScript. We should have a regression test demonstrating this improvement in behavior.
Rob Buis
Comment 9
2013-12-12 14:24:48 PST
Reopening to attach new patch.
Rob Buis
Comment 10
2013-12-12 14:24:59 PST
Created
attachment 219119
[details]
Patch
Rob Buis
Comment 11
2013-12-12 14:40:08 PST
(In reply to
comment #8
)
> (From update of
attachment 218904
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=218904&action=review
> > > Source/WebCore/svg/SVGScriptElement.idl:29 > > + [TreatNullAs=NullString, Reflect] attribute DOMString type; > > This is more than a cleanup. It’s a bug fix. > > The old setter code would not set the content attribute when you set the type attribute from JavaScript. The reverse would work, setting the content attribute would affect what you see from JavaScript. We should have a regression test demonstrating this improvement in behavior.
Makes sense, I'll work on adding a test.
Rob Buis
Comment 12
2013-12-12 15:23:40 PST
Comment on
attachment 219119
[details]
Patch Clear review flag since I want to add the test as well.
Rob Buis
Comment 13
2013-12-12 15:52:15 PST
Created
attachment 219131
[details]
Patch
Rob Buis
Comment 14
2013-12-12 16:00:36 PST
A further datapoint, FireFox syncs the type JS property and the content attribute too.
Brent Fulgham
Comment 15
2013-12-12 21:30:33 PST
I'd love to get this landed; I think it will clear up four build bot test failures on our Debug machines.
Rob Buis
Comment 16
2013-12-13 07:04:46 PST
(In reply to
comment #15
)
> I'd love to get this landed; I think it will clear up four build bot test failures on our Debug machines.
It landed in
r160544
, sorry about the test failures.
Brent Fulgham
Comment 17
2013-12-13 08:53:43 PST
(In reply to
comment #16
)
> (In reply to
comment #15
) > > I'd love to get this landed; I think it will clear up four build bot test failures on our Debug machines. > > It landed in
r160544
, sorry about the test failures.
Excellent! And it did clear those failures. Nice and green again. :-)
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug