RESOLVED FIXED Bug 124144
[GTK] Update GTK builders in Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/port/builders.py
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124144
Summary [GTK] Update GTK builders in Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/port/builders.py
Denis Nomiyama (dnomi)
Reported 2013-11-11 06:00:34 PST
The list of GTK builders in Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/port/builders.py does not match the actual names in http://build.webkit.org/builders.
Attachments
Patch (1.68 KB, patch)
2013-11-11 06:05 PST, Denis Nomiyama (dnomi)
no flags
Patch (1.86 KB, patch)
2013-11-11 06:44 PST, Denis Nomiyama (dnomi)
no flags
Denis Nomiyama (dnomi)
Comment 1 2013-11-11 06:05:08 PST
Mario Sanchez Prada
Comment 2 2013-11-11 06:09:11 PST
Comment on attachment 216561 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=216561&action=review > Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/port/builders.py:71 > "GTK Linux 64-bit Debug": {"port_name": "gtk", "is_debug": True}, This one's name is now "GTK Linux 64-bit Debug WK1". What about updating it too?
Denis Nomiyama (dnomi)
Comment 3 2013-11-11 06:33:36 PST
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 216561 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=216561&action=review > > Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/port/builders.py:71 > > "GTK Linux 64-bit Debug": {"port_name": "gtk", "is_debug": True}, > This one's name is now "GTK Linux 64-bit Debug WK1". What about updating it too? Sure, I'll update the patch.
Denis Nomiyama (dnomi)
Comment 4 2013-11-11 06:44:15 PST
Mario Sanchez Prada
Comment 5 2013-11-11 06:49:49 PST
Comment on attachment 216564 [details] Patch Looks good to me, but I'd rather have someone more familiar with the python magic taking a look to it, in case we might be missing something.
Gustavo Noronha (kov)
Comment 6 2013-11-11 16:41:01 PST
Comment on attachment 216564 [details] Patch LGTM!
Denis Nomiyama (dnomi)
Comment 7 2013-11-12 01:29:50 PST
(In reply to comment #6) > (From update of attachment 216564 [details]) > LGTM! Great! Thanks Gustavo.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 8 2013-11-12 01:56:35 PST
Comment on attachment 216564 [details] Patch Rejecting attachment 216564 [details] from commit-queue. Failed to run "['/Volumes/Data/EWS/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/webkit-patch', '--status-host=webkit-queues.appspot.com', '--bot-id=webkit-cq-01', 'land-attachment', '--force-clean', '--non-interactive', '--parent-command=commit-queue', 216564, '--port=mac']" exit_code: 2 cwd: /Volumes/Data/EWS/WebKit Last 500 characters of output: /git.webkit.org/WebKit d2d6baf..9b6223e master -> origin/master Partial-rebuilding .git/svn/refs/remotes/origin/master/.rev_map.268f45cc-cd09-0410-ab3c-d52691b4dbfc ... Currently at 159100 = d2d6baf839adc8e58564459b2aacd6c6d5b0e753 r159101 = 9b6223e3c25de7f39b567bb175b3e3ec4ad85e03 Done rebuilding .git/svn/refs/remotes/origin/master/.rev_map.268f45cc-cd09-0410-ab3c-d52691b4dbfc First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Fast-forwarded master to refs/remotes/origin/master. Full output: http://webkit-queues.appspot.com/results/22539597
Mario Sanchez Prada
Comment 9 2013-11-12 06:55:27 PST
Comment on attachment 216564 [details] Patch Let's give this another try now that SVN auth seems to be working fine again
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 10 2013-11-12 07:21:05 PST
Comment on attachment 216564 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 216564 Committed r159109: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/159109>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 11 2013-11-12 07:21:08 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Tim Horton
Comment 12 2013-11-12 11:31:18 PST
Tim Horton
Comment 13 2013-11-12 11:38:32 PST
(In reply to comment #12) > I think this broke a webkitpy test: http://build.webkit.org/builders/Apple%20MountainLion%20Release%20WK2%20(Tests)/builds/13504/steps/webkitpy-test/logs/stdio > > Looking into it. Theoretically fixed in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/159130. Do you guys not have any WK2 testers anymore?
Gustavo Noronha (kov)
Comment 14 2013-11-13 03:14:31 PST
Thanks Tim, sorry for the trouble! Our 64 bits release bot is also a tester and it runs the wk2 tests. I think it may be a good idea to split the tests to help see build failures more easily, since our bot ends up being red most of the time because of layout tests being added that we don't pass or the like.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.