WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Search+
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
122936
Add a new flakiness dashboard clone
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122936
Summary
Add a new flakiness dashboard clone
Ryosuke Niwa
Reported
2013-10-16 19:34:32 PDT
Add a new flakiness dashboard clone
Attachments
Adds the app
(47.75 KB, patch)
2013-10-16 19:44 PDT
,
Ryosuke Niwa
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Removed defer attributes
(47.73 KB, patch)
2013-10-16 19:49 PDT
,
Ryosuke Niwa
andersca
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 1
2013-10-16 19:44:12 PDT
Created
attachment 214416
[details]
Adds the app
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 2
2013-10-16 19:49:47 PDT
Created
attachment 214418
[details]
Removed defer attributes
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 3
2013-10-16 19:52:00 PDT
My plan is to check this initial version in and then iterate over time instead of trying to address all use cases, etc... We can always delete it if we later find that the existing flamines dashboard is better.
Anders Carlsson
Comment 4
2013-10-16 19:53:57 PDT
Comment on
attachment 214418
[details]
Removed defer attributes View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=214418&action=review
> Websites/test-results/index.html:23 > + var urls = removeJunkFromResultsPage(removeJunksFromNRWTStdout(rawInput)).split('\n');
Junks should probably be Junk here.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 5
2013-10-16 20:09:07 PDT
Committed
r157555
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/157555
>
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 6
2013-10-16 22:48:46 PDT
Is this already deployed on one of webkit.org servers? I have some security concerns that may limit where this can be deployed.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 7
2013-10-17 00:02:31 PDT
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> Is this already deployed on one of webkit.org servers? I have some security concerns that may limit where this can be deployed.
No. What are your security concerns?
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 8
2013-10-17 08:49:19 PDT
Flakiness dashboard is particularly vulnerable because it's a persistent database that any attacker can write arbitrary data to. While there is some validation in report.php, I think that it's best to have multiple layers or protection, ideally by isolating it to its own domain.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 9
2013-10-17 12:22:38 PDT
(In reply to
comment #8
)
> Flakiness dashboard is particularly vulnerable because it's a persistent database that any attacker can write arbitrary data to.
With that token, the current flakiness dashboard also can also store arbitrary data any attacker sends.
> While there is some validation in report.php, I think that it's best to have multiple layers or protection, ideally by isolating it to its own domain.
Indeed. We'll probably host it at test-results.webkit.org.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug