RESOLVED FIXED 121433
[GTK][EFL] Add ResourceError::internalError() after r138387 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121433
Summary [GTK][EFL] Add ResourceError::internalError() after r138387
Csaba Osztrogonác
Reported 2013-09-16 08:21:30 PDT
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/138387 added the new ResourceError::internalError(), but for Mac only. We need it for GTK and EFL too.
Attachments
Patch (2.89 KB, patch)
2013-09-16 08:27 PDT, Csaba Osztrogonác 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Patch (2.99 KB, patch)
2013-09-17 01:34 PDT, Csaba Osztrogonác 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 1 2013-09-16 08:27:35 PDT
Created attachment 211788 [details] Patch I fixed the GTK implementation as Kwang Yul Seo noticed in https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110141#c13
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 2 2013-09-17 01:34:12 PDT
Created attachment 211873 [details] Patch glib/gi18n-lib.h added to fix the GTK build.
Chris Dumez
Comment 3 2013-09-17 02:14:22 PDT
Comment on attachment 211873 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=211873&action=review > Source/WebKit2/WebProcess/WebCoreSupport/efl/WebErrorsEfl.cpp:75 > +WebCore::ResourceError internalError(const WebCore::KURL& url) Shouldn't we protect this with #if ENABLE(NETWORK_PROCESS) ? > Source/WebKit2/WebProcess/WebCoreSupport/gtk/WebErrorsGtk.cpp:78 > +WebCore::ResourceError internalError(const WebCore::KURL& url) Ditto.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 4 2013-09-17 02:23:05 PDT
Comment on attachment 211873 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=211873&action=review >> Source/WebKit2/WebProcess/WebCoreSupport/efl/WebErrorsEfl.cpp:75 >> +WebCore::ResourceError internalError(const WebCore::KURL& url) > > Shouldn't we protect this with #if ENABLE(NETWORK_PROCESS) ? internalError() is called from only ENABLE(NETWORK_PROCESS) blocks, but it builds now with !ENABLE(NETWORK_PROCESS). I don't think if we should add guards not to have unreachable code. It is the job of the linker to get rid these unused functions.
Chris Dumez
Comment 5 2013-09-17 02:26:58 PDT
Comment on attachment 211873 [details] Patch I don't really mind either way so r+. There is no guard in WebErrors.h anyway.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 6 2013-09-17 02:46:40 PDT
Comment on attachment 211873 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 211873 Committed r155942: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/155942>
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 7 2013-09-17 02:46:46 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.