WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
121114
[EFL][JHBUILD] Use a tarball for libseccomp, instead of git
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121114
Summary
[EFL][JHBUILD] Use a tarball for libseccomp, instead of git
Sergio Correia (qrwteyrutiyoup)
Reported
2013-09-10 12:44:40 PDT
[EFL][JHBUILD] Use a tarball for libseccomp, instead of git
Attachments
Patch
(2.02 KB, patch)
2013-09-10 12:50 PDT
,
Sergio Correia (qrwteyrutiyoup)
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Sergio Correia (qrwteyrutiyoup)
Comment 1
2013-09-10 12:48:31 PDT
Use a tarball for libseccomp instead of git to avoid network issues on the buildbots while checking out the git repo. Using tarballs has the advantage of them being cached if the checksum matches, in which case there will be no need to download them again. Failure example:
http://build.webkit.org/builders/EFL%20Linux%2064-bit%20Release%20WK2/builds/10413/steps/jhbuild/logs/stdio
Sergio Correia (qrwteyrutiyoup)
Comment 2
2013-09-10 12:50:06 PDT
Created
attachment 211227
[details]
Patch
Chris Dumez
Comment 3
2013-09-10 13:42:50 PDT
Comment on
attachment 211227
[details]
Patch Yes, it is a good idea to use tarballs to avoid failures on the bots. R=me.
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 4
2013-09-10 14:57:49 PDT
Comment on
attachment 211227
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 211227 Committed
r155481
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/155481
>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 5
2013-09-10 14:57:53 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug